These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24492557)

  • 1. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach.
    Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic reaction norm models exploiting genotype × environment interaction on sexual precocity indicator traits in Nellore cattle.
    Mota LFM; Fernandes GA; Herrera AC; Scalez DCB; Espigolan R; Magalhães AFB; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; Albuquerque LG
    Anim Genet; 2020 Mar; 51(2):210-223. PubMed ID: 31944356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotype-by-environment interactions for reproduction, body composition, and growth traits in maternal-line pigs based on single-step genomic reaction norms.
    Chen SY; Freitas PHF; Oliveira HR; Lázaro SF; Huang YJ; Howard JT; Gu Y; Schinckel AP; Brito LF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Jun; 53(1):51. PubMed ID: 34139991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction accuracies and genetic parameters for test-day traits from genomic and pedigree-based random regression models with or without heat stress interactions.
    Bohlouli M; Alijani S; Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):488-502. PubMed ID: 30343923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reaction norm for yearling weight in beef cattle using single-step genomic evaluation.
    Oliveira DP; Lourenco DAL; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Santos DJA; de Araújo Neto FR; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Baldi F; Carvalheiro R; de Camargo GMF; Albuquerque LG; Tonhati H
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Feb; 96(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29365164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic prediction of growth traits for pigs in the presence of genotype by environment interactions using single-step genomic reaction norm model.
    Song H; Zhang Q; Misztal I; Ding X
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Nov; 137(6):523-534. PubMed ID: 32779853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotype-by-environment interaction of fertility traits in Danish Holstein cattle using a single-step genomic reaction norm model.
    Zhang Z; Kargo M; Liu A; Thomasen JR; Pan Y; Su G
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Aug; 123(2):202-214. PubMed ID: 30760882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weak genotype x environment interaction suggests that measuring scrotal circumference at 12 and 18 mo of age is helpful to select precocious Brahman cattle.
    Nascimento BM; Carvalheiro R; Teixeira RA; Dias LT; Fortes MRS
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35881500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased prediction accuracy in wheat breeding trials using a marker × environment interaction genomic selection model.
    Lopez-Cruz M; Crossa J; Bonnett D; Dreisigacker S; Poland J; Jannink JL; Singh RP; Autrique E; de los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):569-82. PubMed ID: 25660166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Brown DJ; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2017 Jun; 48(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 28211150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-enabled prediction for tick resistance in Hereford and Braford beef cattle via reaction norm models.
    Mota RR; Lopes PS; Tempelman RJ; Silva FF; Aguilar I; Gomes CC; Cardoso FF
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1834-43. PubMed ID: 27285681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotype by environment (climate) interaction improves genomic prediction for production traits in US Holstein cattle.
    Tiezzi F; de Los Campos G; Parker Gaddis KL; Maltecca C
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2042-2056. PubMed ID: 28109596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.