BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24492936)

  • 1. Volumetric evaluation of hepatic tumors: multi-vendor, multi-reader liver phantom study.
    Lubner MG; Dustin Pooler B; del Rio AM; Durkee B; Pickhardt PJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):488-96. PubMed ID: 24492936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semi-automated quantification of hepatic lesions in a phantom.
    Keil S; Plumhans C; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Suehling M; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Das M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 19104439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volume measurement of liver metastases using multidetector computed tomography: comparison of lesion diameter and volume segmentation - a phantom study.
    Rothe JH; Steffen IG; Lehmkuhl L; Grieser C; Mussler A; Schnapauff D; Stelter L; Denecke T
    Rofo; 2010 Dec; 182(12):1082-90. PubMed ID: 21104596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Volumetric measurement pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules with multi-detector CT: effect of various tube current on measurement accuracy--a chest CT phantom study.
    Linning E; Daqing M
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):934-9. PubMed ID: 19409818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Volume-based response evaluation with consensual lesion selection: a pilot study by using cloud solutions and comparison to RECIST 1.1.
    Oubel E; Bonnard E; Sueoka-Aragane N; Kobayashi N; Charbonnier C; Yamamichi J; Mizobe H; Kimura S
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 25488429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lung, liver and lymph node metastases in follow-up MSCT: comprehensive volumetric assessment of lesion size changes.
    Wulff AM; Bolte H; Fischer S; Freitag-Wolf S; Soza G; Tietjen C; Biederer J; Heller M; Fabel M
    Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):820-8. PubMed ID: 22872601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.
    Petrou M; Quint LE; Nan B; Baker LH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 17242235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical lymph node staging--influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements.
    Fabel M; Wulff A; Heckel F; Bornemann L; Freitag-Wolf S; Heller M; Biederer J; Bolte H
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3124-30. PubMed ID: 22464844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
    Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images.
    Petrick N; Kim HJ; Clunie D; Borradaile K; Ford R; Zeng R; Gavrielides MA; McNitt-Gray MF; Lu ZQ; Fenimore C; Zhao B; Buckler AJ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24331262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hypervascular liver tumors: low tube voltage, high tube current multidetector CT during late hepatic arterial phase for detection--initial clinical experience.
    Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E; Paulson EK; Ho LM; Boll DT; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi TT; Schindera ST
    Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):771-9. PubMed ID: 19346514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segmentation-based partial volume correction for volume estimation of solid lesions in CT.
    Heckel F; Meine H; Moltz JH; Kuhnigk JM; Heverhagen JT; Kiessling A; Buerke B; Hahn HK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Feb; 33(2):462-80. PubMed ID: 24184707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring intra- and inter-reader variability in uni-dimensional, bi-dimensional, and volumetric measurements of solid tumors on CT scans reconstructed at different slice intervals.
    Zhao B; Tan Y; Bell DJ; Marley SE; Guo P; Mann H; Scott ML; Schwartz LH; Ghiorghiu DC
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jun; 82(6):959-68. PubMed ID: 23489982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating New Software for Semiautomated Liver Volumetry--Better than Manual Measurement?
    Noschinski LE; Maiwald B; Voigt P; Wiltberger G; Kahn T; Stumpp P
    Rofo; 2015 Sep; 187(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 26085174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the accuracy of CT volume calculated by circumscription to prolate ellipsoid volume (bidimensional measurement multiplied by coronal long axis).
    Rkein AM; Harrigal C; Friedman AC; Persky D; Krupinski E
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 19124103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms.
    Rothe JH; Grieser C; Lehmkuhl L; Schnapauff D; Fernandez CP; Maurer MH; Mussler A; Hamm B; Denecke T; Steffen IG
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1831-9. PubMed ID: 22717124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target lesion selection: an important factor causing variability of response classification in the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors 1.1.
    Keil S; Barabasch A; Dirrichs T; Bruners P; Hansen NL; Bieling HB; Brümmendorf TH; Kuhl CK
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):509-17. PubMed ID: 24651664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
    Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
    Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semi-automated volumetric analysis of artificial lymph nodes in a phantom study.
    Fabel M; Biederer J; Jochens A; Bornemann L; Soza G; Heller M; Bolte H
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e451-7. PubMed ID: 21094010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.