252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24493091)
1. Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks.
Wolbers M; Blanche P; Koller MT; Witteman JC; Gerds TA
Biostatistics; 2014 Jul; 15(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 24493091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doubly robust estimator of risk in the presence of censoring dependent on time-varying covariates: application to a primary prevention trial for coronary events with pravastatin.
Kawahara T; Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):204. PubMed ID: 32736528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of the marginal survival time in the presence of dependent competing risks using inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) methods.
Matsuyama Y; Yamaguchi T
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 17554753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.
Honvoh GD; Cho H; Kosorok MR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):328. PubMed ID: 36550398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for time to event with semicompeting risks and interval censoring.
Jacqmin-Gadda H; Blanche P; Chary E; Touraine C; Dartigues JF
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2750-2766. PubMed ID: 24803510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic accuracy for predicting ordinal competing risk outcomes using ROC surfaces.
Zhang S; Qu Y; Cheng Y; Lopez OL; Wahed AS
Lifetime Data Anal; 2022 Jan; 28(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 34807357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks.
Blanche P; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5381-97. PubMed ID: 24027076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying and estimating the predictive accuracy for censored time-to-event data with competing risks.
Wu C; Li L
Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(21):3106-3124. PubMed ID: 29766537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On logistic regression with right censored data, with or without competing risks, and its use for estimating treatment effects.
Blanche PF; Holt A; Scheike T
Lifetime Data Anal; 2023 Apr; 29(2):441-482. PubMed ID: 35799026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring.
Dong G; Mao L; Huang B; Gamalo-Siebers M; Wang J; Yu G; Hoaglin DC
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):882-899. PubMed ID: 32552451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating twin concordance for bivariate competing risks twin data.
Scheike TH; Holst KK; Hjelmborg JB
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1193-204. PubMed ID: 24132877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of treatment effect adjusting for dependent censoring using the IPCW method: an application to a large primary prevention study for coronary events (MEGA study).
Yoshida M; Matsuyama Y; Ohashi Y;
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 17848493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.
Blanche P; Proust-Lima C; Loubère L; Berr C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 25311240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing issues associated with evaluating prediction models for survival endpoints based on the concordance statistic.
Wang M; Long Q
Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):897-906. PubMed ID: 26756274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An inverse probability weighted regression method that accounts for right-censoring for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome.
Yu Y; Zhang M; Mukherjee B
Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3699-3715. PubMed ID: 37392070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Summary measure of discrimination in survival models based on cumulative/dynamic time-dependent ROC curves.
Lambert J; Chevret S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2088-2102. PubMed ID: 24395866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard.
Donoghoe MW; Gebski V
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28376736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prioritized concordance index for hierarchical survival outcomes.
Cheung LC; Pan Q; Hyun N; Katki HA
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2868-2882. PubMed ID: 30957257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating the concordance probability in a survival analysis with a discrete number of risk groups.
Heller G; Mo Q
Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Apr; 22(2):263-79. PubMed ID: 26022558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
