These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Comparison of stress perfusion MRI and SPECT for detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with angiographically proven three-vessel coronary artery disease. Chung SY; Lee KY; Chun EJ; Lee WW; Park EK; Chang HJ; Choi SI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):356-62. PubMed ID: 20651190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ischemic burden by 3-dimensional myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Jogiya R; Morton G; De Silva K; Reyes E; Hachamovitch R; Kozerke S; Nagel E; Underwood SR; Plein S Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jul; 7(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 24867884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2D high resolution vs. 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Nazir MS; Shome J; Villa ADM; Ryan M; Kassam Z; Razavi R; Kozerke S; Ismail TF; Perera D; Chiribiri A; Plein S Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 23(6):811-819. PubMed ID: 34179941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of 1.5T and 3T Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Detecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease. Min JY; Ko SM; Song IY; Yi JG; Hwang HK; Shin JK Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1007-1020. PubMed ID: 30386133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]