These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24494514)

  • 1. Operative vaginal delivery at Port Moresby General Hospital from 1977 to 2010.
    Mola GD; Kuk J
    P N G Med J; 2011; 54(3-4):174-84. PubMed ID: 24494514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled trial of two instruments for vacuum-assisted delivery (Vacca Re-Usable OmniCup and the Bird anterior and posterior cups) to compare failure rates, safety and use effectiveness.
    Mola GD; Kuk JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 20618242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symphysiotomy or caesarean section after failed trial of assisted delivery.
    Mola GD
    P N G Med J; 1995 Sep; 38(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9522856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery across two decades: accompanying outcomes and instrument preferences.
    Hehir MP; Reidy FR; Wilkinson MN; Mahony R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Nov; 171(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 23998554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operative vaginal delivery: current trends in obstetrics.
    Goetzinger KR; Macones GA
    Womens Health (Lond); 2008 May; 4(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 19072477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in operative vaginal delivery rates and associated maternal complication rates in an inner-city hospital.
    Kabiru WN; Jamieson D; Graves W; Lindsay M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11349172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications.
    Al-Kadri H; Sabr Y; Al-Saif S; Abulaimoun B; Ba'Aqeel H; Saleh A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jul; 82(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 12790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective study of matched symphysiotomies and caesarian sections at Port Moresby General Hospital.
    Mola G; Lamang M; McGoldrick IA
    P N G Med J; 1981 Jun; 24(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 6950596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria.
    Adaji SE; Shittu SO; Sule ST
    Ann Afr Med; 2009; 8(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 19805939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital.
    Zhang VR; Tan EL; Edison PE; Kanagalingam D
    Singapore Med J; 2023 May; 64(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 35706407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Silastic cup vacuum extractor or forceps: a comparative study.
    Svigos JM; Cave DG; Vigneswaran R; Resch A; Christiansen J
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2099728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.