These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24494696)

  • 1. Merging applicability domains for in silico assessment of chemical mutagenicity.
    Liu R; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 24494696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing predictive performance of CASE Ultra expert system models using the applicability domains of individual toxicity alerts.
    Chakravarti SK; Saiakhov RD; Klopman G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2609-18. PubMed ID: 22947043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
    Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of methods to define the applicability domain of structural alert models.
    Ellison CM; Sherhod R; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ; Madden JC; Judson PN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):975-85. PubMed ID: 21488656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of in silico models for prediction of mutagenicity.
    Bakhtyari NG; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Martin T; Young D
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2013; 31(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 23534394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of the structural requirements for mutagencitiy, by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals. II. General Ames mutagenicity model.
    Serafimova R; Todorov M; Pavlov T; Kotov S; Jacob E; Aptula A; Mekenyan O
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 20(4):662-76. PubMed ID: 17381132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities.
    Valencia A; Prous J; Mora O; Sadrieh N; Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 273(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 24090816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for ames test mutagenicity prediction: scope and limitations.
    Hillebrecht A; Muster W; Brigo A; Kansy M; Weiser T; Singer T
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 21534561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Random forest prediction of mutagenicity from empirical physicochemical descriptors.
    Zhang QY; Aires-de-Sousa J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17238242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
    Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity.
    Votano JR; Parham M; Hall LH; Kier LB; Oloff S; Tropsha A; Xie Q; Tong W
    Mutagenesis; 2004 Sep; 19(5):365-77. PubMed ID: 15388809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
    Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critically Assessing the Predictive Power of QSAR Models for Human Liver Microsomal Stability.
    Liu R; Schyman P; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1566-75. PubMed ID: 26170251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In silico prediction of the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using a novel two-QSAR approach.
    Ding YL; Lyu YC; Leong MK
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():102-114. PubMed ID: 28027902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups.
    Ford KA; Ryslik G; Chan BK; Lewin-Koh SC; Almeida D; Stokes M; Gomez SR
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2017 Jan; 27(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 27813437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity using in silico modelling: A case study of polychlorinated biphenyls.
    Vračko M; Bobst S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):667-82. PubMed ID: 26329919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity.
    Hansen K; Mika S; Schroeter T; Sutter A; ter Laak A; Steger-Hartmann T; Heinrich N; Müller KR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2077-81. PubMed ID: 19702240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability domains for classification problems: Benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set.
    Sushko I; Novotarskyi S; Körner R; Pandey AK; Cherkasov A; Li J; Gramatica P; Hansen K; Schroeter T; Müller KR; Xi L; Liu H; Yao X; Öberg T; Hormozdiari F; Dao P; Sahinalp C; Todeschini R; Polishchuk P; Artemenko A; Kuz'min V; Martin TM; Young DM; Fourches D; Muratov E; Tropsha A; Baskin I; Horvath D; Marcou G; Muller C; Varnek A; Prokopenko VV; Tetko IV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2094-111. PubMed ID: 21033656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.
    Honma M; Kitazawa A; Cayley A; Williams RV; Barber C; Hanser T; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Myatt GJ; Cross KP; Benfenati E; Raitano G; Mekenyan O; Petkov P; Bossa C; Benigni R; Battistelli CL; Giuliani A; Tcheremenskaia O; DeMeo C; Norinder U; Koga H; Jose C; Jeliazkova N; Kochev N; Paskaleva V; Yang C; Daga PR; Clark RD; Rathman J
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 30357358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of in-house and off-the-shelf in silico models: implications on guidance for mutagenicity assessment.
    Jolly R; Ahmed KB; Zwickl C; Watson I; Gombar V
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 71(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 25656493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.