These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24495114)

  • 1. Sexual conflict and interacting phenotypes: a quantitative genetic analysis of fecundity and copula duration in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edward DA; Poissant J; Wilson AJ; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1651-60. PubMed ID: 24495114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemiclonal analysis of interacting phenotypes in male and female Drosophila melanogaster.
    Tennant HM; Sonser EE; Long TA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 May; 14():95. PubMed ID: 24884361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
    Friberg U; Lew TA; Byrne PG; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Between-sex genetic covariance constrains the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ingleby FC; Innocenti P; Rundle HD; Morrow EH
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1721-32. PubMed ID: 24893565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evolution of female traits under different levels of intersexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Nandy B; Gupta V; Udaykumar N; Samant MA; Sen S; Prasad NG
    Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):412-25. PubMed ID: 24117169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex-specific evolutionary potential of pre- and postcopulatory reproductive interactions in the field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.
    Hall MD; Lailvaux SP; Brooks RC
    Evolution; 2013 Jun; 67(6):1831-7. PubMed ID: 23730774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict.
    Lew TA; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16568635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic variation in male and female reproductive characters associated with sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Friberg U
    Behav Genet; 2005 Jul; 35(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 15971026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila.
    Miller GT; Pitnick S
    Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5596):1230-3. PubMed ID: 12424377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quantitative genetics and coevolution of male and female reproductive traits.
    Snook RR; Bacigalupe LD; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):1926-34. PubMed ID: 20100215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bedhomme S; Chippindale AK; Prasad NG; Delcourt M; Abbott JK; Mallet MA; Rundle HD
    J Genet; 2011 Dec; 90(3):443-52. PubMed ID: 22227931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The timing of mating influences reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster: implications for sexual conflict.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Nichols RV; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2010 May; 23(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 20345814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transgenerational effects of sexual interactions and sexual conflict: non-sires boost the fecundity of females in the following generation.
    Garcia-Gonzalez F; Dowling DK
    Biol Lett; 2015 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 25788486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative genetic models of sexual conflict based on interacting phenotypes.
    Moore AJ; Pizzari T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S88-97. PubMed ID: 15795865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural genetic variation in complex mating behaviors of male Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ruedi EA; Hughes KA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 18369720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic drift in antagonistic genes leads to divergence in sex-specific fitness between experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hesketh J; Fowler K; Reuter M
    Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1503-10. PubMed ID: 23617925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Male × female interaction for a pre-copulatory trait, but not a post-copulatory trait, among cosmopolitan populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Little MK
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e31683. PubMed ID: 22431964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A QTL analysis of female variation contributing to refractoriness and sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lawniczak MK; Begun DJ
    Genet Res; 2005 Oct; 86(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 16356284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.