These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24495276)

  • 1. Sounds perceived as annoying by hearing-aid users in their daily soundscape.
    Skagerstrand Å; Stenfelt S; Arlinger S; Wikström J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 24495276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.
    Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Zhang X
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).
    Meis M; Huber R; Fischer RL; Schulte M; Spilski J; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S118-S129. PubMed ID: 27875658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.
    Palmer CV; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16959733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the barriers and facilitators to optimal hearing aid self-efficacy.
    Meyer C; Hickson L; Fletcher A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S28-37. PubMed ID: 24447235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Chinese version "satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL)" survey for hearing-aid users.
    Fang TY; Chang HJ; Wan TK; Wang PC; Chen YH
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 23514602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a multi-channel algorithm for reducing transient sounds.
    Keshavarzi M; Baer T; Moore BCJ
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):624-631. PubMed ID: 29764254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults.
    Hickson L; Meyer C; Lovelock K; Lampert M; Khan A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S18-27. PubMed ID: 24447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 23777478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation of factors that influence help-seeking for hearing impairment in older adults.
    Meyer C; Hickson L; Lovelock K; Lampert M; Khan A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S3-17. PubMed ID: 24405446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving uptake and outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older adults: what are the barriers and facilitators?
    Hickson L; Meyer C
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S1-2. PubMed ID: 24528289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the relationship between technology use, hearing help-seeking, and hearing aid outcomes in older adults.
    Stieglitz Ham H; Bunn P; Meyer C; Khan A; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S38-42. PubMed ID: 24400825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.