These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24495554)
1. Error rate for imputation from the Illumina BovineSNP50 chip to the Illumina BovineHD chip. Schrooten C; Dassonneville R; Ducrocq V; Brøndum RF; Lund MS; Chen J; Liu Z; González-Recio O; Pena J; Druet T Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):10. PubMed ID: 24495554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of genotype imputation in Nelore cattle. Carvalheiro R; Boison SA; Neves HH; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS; Utsunomiya YT; O'Brien AM; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 25927950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips. Boison SA; Santos DJ; Utsunomiya AH; Carvalheiro R; Neves HH; O'Brien AM; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MV J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4969-89. PubMed ID: 25958293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle. van Binsbergen R; Bink MC; Calus MP; van Eeuwijk FA; Hayes BJ; Hulsegge I; Veerkamp RF Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jul; 46(1):41. PubMed ID: 25022768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds. Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Venot E; Guillaume F; Dassonneville R; Fritz S; Ducrocq V; Phocas F; Boichard D; Croiseau P Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Sep; 45(1):33. PubMed ID: 24004563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips. Segelke D; Chen J; Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Thaller G; Reents R J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5403-5411. PubMed ID: 22916947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle. Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle. Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes from low-density panels in Japanese Black cattle. Ogawa S; Matsuda H; Taniguchi Y; Watanabe T; Takasuga A; Sugimoto Y; Iwaisaki H Anim Sci J; 2016 Jan; 87(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 26032028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation in Braford and Hereford beef cattle. Piccoli ML; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Larmer SG; Schenkel FS BMC Genet; 2014 Dec; 15():157. PubMed ID: 25543517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits. Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombination locations and rates in beef cattle assessed from parent-offspring pairs. Weng ZQ; Saatchi M; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):34. PubMed ID: 24885305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population. Pausch H; Aigner B; Emmerling R; Edel C; Götz KU; Fries R Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Feb; 45(1):3. PubMed ID: 23406470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different imputation methods from low- to high-density panels using Chinese Holstein cattle. Weng Z; Zhang Z; Zhang Q; Fu W; He S; Ding X Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 23228675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Impacts of SNP genotyping call rate and SNP genotyping error rate on imputation accuracy inHolsteincattle]. Li Z; He J; Jiang J; G Tait R; Bauck S; Guo W; Wu XL Yi Chuan; 2019 Jul; 41(7):644-652. PubMed ID: 31307973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of reference population size and available ancestor genotypes on imputation of Mexican Holstein genotypes. García-Ruiz A; Ruiz-Lopez FJ; Wiggans GR; Van Tassell CP; Montaldo HH J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3478-84. PubMed ID: 25771055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: Characteristics and use of the Illumina BovineLD and GeneSeek Genomic Profiler low-density bead chips for genomic evaluation. Wiggans GR; Cooper TA; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Simpson EB J Dairy Sci; 2013 Feb; 96(2):1258-63. PubMed ID: 23261376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imputation of missing genotypes from low- to high-density SNP panel in different population designs. He S; Wang S; Fu W; Ding X; Zhang Q Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25431355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ensemble-based approach to imputation of moderate-density genotypes for genomic selection with application to Angus cattle. Sun C; Wu XL; Weigel KA; Rosa GJ; Bauck S; Woodward BW; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Gianola D Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):133-50. PubMed ID: 22809677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]