275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24496288)
21. Auditory perceptual efficacy of nonlinear frequency compression used in hearing aids: A review.
Mao Y; Yang J; Hahn E; Xu L
J Otol; 2017 Sep; 12(3):97-111. PubMed ID: 29937844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise.
Kuk F; Keenan D; Korhonen P; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):465-79. PubMed ID: 19764167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss.
Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Hudson M; Boretzki M; Scollie S; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 25731582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can Closed-Set Word Recognition Differentially Assess Vowel and Consonant Perception for School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss?
Buss E; Felder J; Miller MK; Leibold LJ; Calandruccio L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3934-3950. PubMed ID: 36194777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
Flaherty MM; Browning J; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 33538428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.
Leibold LJ; Browning JM; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):259-267. PubMed ID: 31365355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
McDermott H; Henshall K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Consonant recognition performance of hearing-impaired listeners using one linear and three nonlinear hearing aids.
Sammeth CA; Tetzeli M; Ochs MT
J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Aug; 7(4):240-50. PubMed ID: 8827918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomized controlled trial of nonlinear frequency compression versus conventional processing in hearing aids: speech and language of children at three years of age.
Ching TY; Day J; Zhang V; Dillon H; Van Buynder P; Seeto M; Hou S; Marnane V; Thomson J; Street L; Wong A; Burns L; Flynn C
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52 Suppl 2(0 2):S46-54. PubMed ID: 24350695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.
Souza P; Arehart K; Schoof T; Anderson M; Strori D; Balmert L
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1280-1292. PubMed ID: 30998547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: what conventional clinical tools may miss.
Hillock-Dunn A; Taylor C; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e57-60. PubMed ID: 25329371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
