These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24499115)

  • 1. Using panicogenic inhalations of carbon dioxide enriched air to induce attentional bias for threat: Implications for the development of anxiety disorders.
    Valdivia-Salas S; Forsyth JP; Berghoff CR; Ritzert TR
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(8):1474-82. PubMed ID: 24499115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observational fear conditioning in the acquisition and extinction of attentional bias for threat: an experimental evaluation.
    Kelly MM; Forsyth JP
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):324-35. PubMed ID: 17516811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interoceptive fear conditioning and panic disorder: the role of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus predictability.
    Acheson DT; Forsyth JP; Moses E
    Behav Ther; 2012 Mar; 43(1):174-89. PubMed ID: 22304889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluative differential conditioning of disgust: a sticky form of relational learning that is resistant to extinction.
    Olatunji BO; Forsyth JP; Cherian A
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(6):820-34. PubMed ID: 17158024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Context and renewal of conditioned fear: an experimental evaluation using 20% carbon dioxide-enriched air as an unconditioned stimulus.
    Finlay CG; Forsyth JP
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Aug; 23(6):737-45. PubMed ID: 19342193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interoceptive fear conditioning as a learning model of panic disorder: an experimental evaluation using 20% CO(2)-enriched air in a non-clinical sample.
    Acheson DT; Forsyth JP; Prenoveau JM; Bouton ME
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Oct; 45(10):2280-94. PubMed ID: 17548049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direction of attention bias to threat relates to differences in fear acquisition and extinction in anxious children.
    Waters AM; Kershaw R
    Behav Res Ther; 2015 Jan; 64():56-65. PubMed ID: 25540863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a mutual relationship between opposite attentional biases underlying anxiety?
    Onnis R; Dadds MR; Bryant RA
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):582-94. PubMed ID: 21668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the development of panic disorder with interoceptive conditioning.
    De Cort K; Schroijen M; Hurlemann R; Claassen S; Hoogenhout J; Van den Bergh O; Goossens L; Van Diest I; Schruers K
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 27887860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expectancy bias in a selective conditioning procedure: trait anxiety increases the threat value of a blocked stimulus.
    Boddez Y; Vervliet B; Baeyens F; Lauwers S; Hermans D; Beckers T
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2012 Jun; 43(2):832-7. PubMed ID: 22197754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of an attentional bias for angry faces following Pavlovian fear conditioning.
    Pischek-Simpson LK; Boschen MJ; Neumann DL; Waters AM
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Apr; 47(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 19232574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex differences in response to an observational fear conditioning procedure.
    Kelly MM; Forsyth JP
    Behav Ther; 2007 Dec; 38(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 18021949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of "interoceptive" fear conditioning in the development of panic disorder.
    De Cort K; Griez E; Büchler M; Schruers K
    Behav Ther; 2012 Mar; 43(1):203-15. PubMed ID: 22304891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinstatement of fear in humans: autonomic and experiential responses in a differential conditioning paradigm.
    Kull S; Müller BH; Blechert J; Wilhelm FH; Michael T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22445769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is emotional Stroop interference linked to affective responses? Evidence from skin conductance and facial electromyography.
    Blanchette I; Richards A
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 22906087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat-related information?
    Martin M; Williams RM; Clark DM
    Behav Res Ther; 1991; 29(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 2021377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conditioning-induced attentional bias for face stimuli measured with the emotional Stroop task.
    Lee TH; Lim SL; Lee K; Kim HT; Choi JS
    Emotion; 2009 Feb; 9(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 19186927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The absence of relation between anxiety sensitivity and fear conditioning using 20% versus 13% CO2-enriched air as unconditioned stimuli.
    Forsyth JP; Palav A; Duff K
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Feb; 37(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9990745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deficient safety learning characterizes high trait anxious individuals.
    Gazendam FJ; Kamphuis JH; Kindt M
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):342-52. PubMed ID: 23174693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional bias to threat and emotional response to biological challenge.
    Nay WT; Thorpe GL; Roberson-Nay R; Hecker JE; Sigmon ST
    J Anxiety Disord; 2004; 18(5):609-27. PubMed ID: 15275942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.