BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24499414)

  • 1. Environmental quality alters female costs and benefits of evolving under enforced monogamy.
    Grazer VM; Demont M; Michalczyk Ł; Gage MJ; Martin OY
    BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Feb; 14():21. PubMed ID: 24499414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Miller GT; Reagan J; Holland B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 May; 268(1471):1071-80. PubMed ID: 11375092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mating patterns influence vulnerability to the extinction vortex.
    Godwin JL; Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Martin OY; Gage MJG
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Aug; 26(8):4226-4239. PubMed ID: 32558066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental removal of sexual selection leads to decreased investment in an immune component in female Tribolium castaneum.
    Hangartner S; Michalczyk Ł; Gage MJ; Martin OY
    Infect Genet Evol; 2015 Jul; 33():212-8. PubMed ID: 25958137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria.
    Martin OY; Hosken DJ; Ward PI
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271(1537):353-9. PubMed ID: 15101693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual selection and the evolution of male and female cognition: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.
    Baur J; Nsanzimana JD; Berger D
    Evolution; 2019 Dec; 73(12):2390-2400. PubMed ID: 31273775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of between-species reproductive interference capability under different within-species mating regimes.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    Evolution; 2017 Nov; 71(11):2721-2727. PubMed ID: 28884796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual selection increased offspring production via evolution of male and female traits.
    Kyogoku D; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):501-511. PubMed ID: 33314378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
    Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transgenerational effects of maternal sexual interactions in seed beetles.
    Zajitschek SRK; Dowling DK; Head ML; Rodriguez-Exposito E; Garcia-Gonzalez F
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Sep; 121(3):282-291. PubMed ID: 29802349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual conflict drives micro- and macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in immunity.
    Bagchi B; Corbel Q; Khan I; Payne E; Banerji D; Liljestrand-Rönn J; Martinossi-Allibert I; Baur J; Sayadi A; Immonen E; Arnqvist G; Söderhäll I; Berger D
    BMC Biol; 2021 Jun; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 34078377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consequences of sexual selection in well-adapted and maladapted populations of bean beetles†.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Savković U; Đorđević M; Arnqvist G; Stojković B; Berger D
    Evolution; 2018 Mar; 72(3):518-530. PubMed ID: 29238970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monogamy in marine fishes.
    Whiteman EA; Côte IM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2004 May; 79(2):351-75. PubMed ID: 15191228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
    Simmons LW; García-González F
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2580-91. PubMed ID: 18691259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual selection protects against extinction.
    Lumley AJ; Michalczyk Ł; Kitson JJ; Spurgin LG; Morrison CA; Godwin JL; Dickinson ME; Martin OY; Emerson BC; Chapman T; Gage MJ
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7557):470-3. PubMed ID: 25985178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple Evolutionary Routes to Monogamy: Modeling the Coevolution of Mating Decisions and Parental Investment.
    Jungwirth A; Johnstone RA
    Am Nat; 2019 Feb; 193(2):E29-E40. PubMed ID: 30720358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Thilliez E; Arnqvist G; Berger D
    Evol Appl; 2019 Aug; 12(7):1371-1384. PubMed ID: 31417621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.