These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24499723)

  • 21. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with thoracic kyphosis.
    Chen Y; Guo X; Fu J; Dong T; Liu X; Lv H
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7571-7578. PubMed ID: 34154341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery.
    Høiseth LØ; Hoff IE; Myre K; Landsverk SA; Kirkebøen KA
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Jul; 56(6):777-86. PubMed ID: 22288953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia.
    Desebbe O; Boucau C; Farhat F; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Mar; 110(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20185658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Hedderich J; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 19076570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Quaden R; Hanss R; Meybohm P; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):650-8. PubMed ID: 19114894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
    Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Functional hemodynamic parameters do not reflect volume responsiveness in the immediate phase after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.
    Kronas N; Kubitz JC; Forkl S; Kemming GI; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):780-3. PubMed ID: 21115364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children under general anaesthesia using dynamic parameters and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Pereira de Souza Neto E; Grousson S; Duflo F; Ducreux C; Joly H; Convert J; Mottolese C; Dailler F; Cannesson M
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Jun; 106(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 21525016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients experiencing intra-abdominal hypertension.
    Liu X; Fu Q; Mi W; Liu H; Zhang H; Wang P
    Biosci Trends; 2013 Apr; 7(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23612080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients by using 3 dynamic indices: is it all equally effective?
    Wacharasint P; Lertamornpong A; Wattanathum A; Wongsa A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95 Suppl 5():S149-56. PubMed ID: 22934461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
    Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.
    Renner J; Broch O; Duetschke P; Scheewe J; Höcker J; Moseby M; Jung O; Bein B
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22113930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
    Zlicar M; Novak-Jankovic V; Blagus R; Cecconi M
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):825-832. PubMed ID: 29149433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic and static preload indexes to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated, isoflurane anesthetized dogs.
    Celeita-Rodríguez N; Teixeira-Neto FJ; Garofalo NA; Dalmagro TL; Girotto CH; Oliveira GCV; Santos IF
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2019 May; 46(3):276-288. PubMed ID: 30979542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
    Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression.
    Messina A; Caporale M; Calabrò L; Lionetti G; Bono D; Matronola GM; Brunati A; Frassanito L; Morenghi E; Antonelli M; Chew MS; Cecconi M
    Crit Care; 2023 Nov; 27(1):431. PubMed ID: 37940953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
    Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
    Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.
    Piccioni F; Bernasconi F; Tramontano GTA; Langer M
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 27306799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery.
    Derichard A; Robin E; Tavernier B; Costecalde M; Fleyfel M; Onimus J; Lebuffe G; Chambon JP; Vallet B
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 103(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 19797246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.