403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24499755)
1. Effects of age, parity, and device type on complications and discontinuation of intrauterine devices.
Aoun J; Dines VA; Stovall DW; Mete M; Nelson CB; Gomez-Lobo V
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 123(3):585-592. PubMed ID: 24499755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.
Madden T; McNicholas C; Zhao Q; Secura GM; Eisenberg DL; Peipert JF
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 124(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 25198262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complications and continuation of intrauterine device use among commercially insured teenagers.
Berenson AB; Tan A; Hirth JM; Wilkinson GS
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 121(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 23635730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hormonal intrauterine devices.
Rybo G; Andersson K; Odlind V
Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8489751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuation of copper and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices: a retrospective cohort study.
Phillips SJ; Hofler LG; Modest AM; Harvey LFB; Wu LH; Hacker MR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):57.e1-57.e6. PubMed ID: 28315664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Free-of-charge long-acting reversible contraception: two-year discontinuation, its risk factors, and reasons.
Saloranta TH; Gyllenberg FK; But A; Gissler M; Laine MK; Heikinheimo O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):886.e1-886.e17. PubMed ID: 32562657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women.
Lohr PA; Lyus R; Prager S
Contraception; 2017 Jun; 95(6):529-537. PubMed ID: 27591814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of insertion of the copper IUD and LNG-IUS in nulliparous women: a systematic review.
Foran T; Butcher BE; Kovacs G; Bateson D; O'Connor V
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Oct; 23(5):379-386. PubMed ID: 30382754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expulsion and continuation rates of the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system in adolescents and adult women.
Brull E; Machado HC; Bahamondes L; Juliato CRT
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2023 Aug; 28(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 37335234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception.
Bilgehan F; Dilbaz B; Karadag B; Deveci CD
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1426-32. PubMed ID: 26180028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and continued use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as compared with the copper intrauterine device among women living with HIV in South Africa: A randomized controlled trial.
Todd CS; Jones HE; Langwenya N; Hoover DR; Chen PL; Petro G; Myer L
PLoS Med; 2020 May; 17(5):e1003110. PubMed ID: 32442189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical carcinogenesis and contraception.
Misra JS; Engineer AD; Das K; Tandon P
Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 1935511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
