These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24499812)

  • 1. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
    Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Strandell K; Jurkovic D; Ross J; Barnhart KT; Yalcinkaya TM; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GCM; Koks CAM; Klinte I; Hogström L; Janssen ICAH; Kragt H; Hoek A; Trimbos-Kemper TCM; Broekmans FJM; Willemsen WNP; Ankum WM; Mol BW; van Wely M; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ;
    Lancet; 2014 Apr; 383(9927):1483-1489. PubMed ID: 24499812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).
    Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Ross JA; Yalcinkaya TM; Barnhart KT; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GC; Koks CA; Mol BW; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ; van Wely M;
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2038-47. PubMed ID: 26173606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?
    van Mello NM; Mol F; Opmeer BC; de Bekker-Grob EW; Essink-Bot ML; Ankum WM; Mol BW; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 20884296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy.
    Odejinmi F; Oliver R
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 24969151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cheng X; Tian X; Yan Z; Jia M; Deng J; Wang Y; Fan D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152343. PubMed ID: 27015601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ESEP study: salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; the impact on future fertility: a randomised controlled trial.
    Mol F; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Yalcinkaya T; Verhoeve HR; Koks CA; van der Linden PJ; Graziosi GC; Thurkow AL; Hoek A; Hogström L; Klinte I; Nilsson K; van Mello NM; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Mol BW; Hajenius PJ;
    BMC Womens Health; 2008 Jun; 8():11. PubMed ID: 18582372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.
    Chen L; Zhu D; Wu Q; Yu Y
    Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():59-63. PubMed ID: 28951291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Salpingotomy vs salpingectomy--a comparison of women's fertility after surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy during a 24-month follow-up study].
    Kostrzewa M; Zyła M; Litwińska E; Kolasa-Zwierzchowska D; Szpakowski A; Stachowiak G; Szpakowski M; Wilczyński JR
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 24505950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy.
    Tulandi T; Guralnick M
    Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 1986973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical methods for tubal pregnancy - effects on ovarian response to controlled stimulation during IVF.
    Ödesjö E; Bergh C; Strandell A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Dec; 94(12):1322-6. PubMed ID: 26358274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
    Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic salpingotomy using the floseal hemostatic sealant in patients with tubal pregnancy.
    Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yoon BS; Seong SJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Sep; 24(9):651-5. PubMed ID: 25062090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of medical management versus conservative surgery for early tubal pregnancy.
    Bourel G; Pelletier-Fleury N; Bouyer J; Delbarre A; Fernandez H; Capmas P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb; 34(2):261-267. PubMed ID: 30520964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy is appropriate in the presence of healthy-looking contralateral tube.
    Tulandi T
    Evid Based Med; 2014 Oct; 19(5):177. PubMed ID: 24919975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive outcome after microsurgical treatment of tubal pregnancy in women with a single fallopian tube.
    Oelsner G; Rabinovitch O; Morad J; Mashiach S; Serr DM
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Jun; 31(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 3735260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ectopic pregnancy.
    DeCherney AH; Jones EE
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 28(2):365-74. PubMed ID: 2410172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation.
    Johnson N; van Voorst S; Sowter MC; Strandell A; Mol BW
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jan; 2010(1):CD002125. PubMed ID: 20091531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ectopic pregnancy and laparoscopy.
    Saranovic M; Vasiljevic M; Prorocic M; Macut ND; Filipovic T
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 24992775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Li J; Jiang K; Zhao F
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e007339. PubMed ID: 26351180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy preferable to salpingectomy? An economic analysis.
    Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):834-9. PubMed ID: 9236650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.