148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24500777)
1. Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Kapler IV; Wiseheart M
Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):729-41. PubMed ID: 24500777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Level of initial training moderates the effects of distributing practice over multiple days with expanding, contracting, and uniform schedules: Evidence for study-phase retrieval.
Toppino TC; Phelan HA; Gerbier E
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):969-978. PubMed ID: 29728945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimising retention through multiple study opportunities over days: The benefit of an expanding schedule of repetitions.
Gerbier E; Toppino TC; Koenig O
Memory; 2015; 23(6):943-54. PubMed ID: 25116727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?
Vaughn KE; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):897-909. PubMed ID: 27027887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval.
Pyc MA; Balota DA; McDermott KB; Tully T; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):965-77. PubMed ID: 24643791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: a comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules.
Gerbier E; Koenig O
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 21895560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrieval practice over the long term: should spacing be expanding or equal-interval?
Kang SH; Lindsey RV; Mozer MC; Pashler H
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1544-50. PubMed ID: 24744260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 19966244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice.
Mettler E; Massey CM; Kellman PJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jul; 145(7):897-917. PubMed ID: 27123574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: when and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention.
Storm BC; Bjork RA; Storm JC
Mem Cognit; 2010 Mar; 38(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 20173196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.
Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Pashler H
Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):978-88. PubMed ID: 23690275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
Logan JM; Balota DA
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
Jönsson FU; Kubik V; Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Jonsson B
Psychol Res; 2014 Sep; 78(5):623-33. PubMed ID: 24173813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: a multinomial processing tree analysis.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Erdfelder E
Memory; 2012; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 22171809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough?
Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Aug; 140(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 21707204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating and explaining the effects of successive relearning on long-term retention.
Rawson KA; Vaughn KE; Walsh M; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 29431462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24671778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
