251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24500860)
1. Risk perception and public concerns of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones in Korea.
Kim K; Kim HJ; Song DJ; Cho YM; Choi JW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 May; 35(4):235-44. PubMed ID: 24500860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Relationship between Risk Perception of Cell Phones and Objective Knowledge of EMF in Korea.
Seo MS; Choi JW; Kim KH; Choi HD
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 33019749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No effects of acute exposure to the electromagnetic field emitted by mobile phones on brainstem auditory potentials in young volunteers.
Bak M; Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Zmyślony M; Dudarewicz A
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2003; 16(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 14587532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted by mobile phones decreases computer-assisted visual reaction time.
Mortazavi SM; Rouintan MS; Taeb S; Dehghan N; Ghaffarpanah AA; Sadeghi Z; Ghafouri F
Acta Neurol Belg; 2012 Jun; 112(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 22426673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of mobile phone and base station risks.
Siegrist M; Earle TC; Gutscher H; Keller C
Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1253-64. PubMed ID: 16297229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?
Wiedemann PM; Freudenstein F; Böhmert C; Wiart J; Croft RJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 28594366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure.
Frei P; Mohler E; Bürgi A; Fröhlich J; Neubauer G; Braun-Fahrländer C; Röösli M;
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19819523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of wireless phones and the risk of salivary gland tumours: a case-control study.
Söderqvist F; Carlberg M; Hardell L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Nov; 21(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 22433632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposure Perception as a Key Indicator of Risk Perception and Acceptance of Sources of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields.
Freudenstein F; Wiedemann PM; Brown TW
J Environ Public Health; 2015; 2015():198272. PubMed ID: 26229540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields--a randomized survey study.
Frick U; Rehm J; Eichhammer P
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Jul; 205(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 12173533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electromagnetic pollution (electrosmog)--potential hazards of our electromagnetic future].
Nowak D; Radon K
MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 Feb; 146(9):38-40. PubMed ID: 15352705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risks perception of electromagnetic fields in Taiwan: the influence of psychopathology and the degree of sensitivity to electromagnetic fields.
Tseng MC; Lin YP; Hu FC; Cheng TJ
Risk Anal; 2013 Nov; 33(11):2002-12. PubMed ID: 23551091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany).
Schüz J; Böhler E; Berg G; Schlehofer B; Hettinger I; Schlaefer K; Wahrendorf J; Kunna-Grass K; Blettner M
Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 16443797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Affecting Risk Perception of Electromagnetic Waves From 5G Network Base Stations.
Koh TH; Choi JW; Seo M; Choi HD; Kim K
Bioelectromagnetics; 2020 Oct; 41(7):491-499. PubMed ID: 32865268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electromagnetic fields and health effects--epidemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease.
Johansen C
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2004; 30 Suppl 1():1-30. PubMed ID: 15255560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of electromagnetic field induced by radio frequency waves at 900 to 1800 MHz on bone mineral density of iliac bone wings.
Atay T; Aksoy BA; Aydogan NH; Baydar ML; Yildiz M; Ozdemir R
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20(5):1556-60. PubMed ID: 19816295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study.
Nam KC; Lee JH; Noh HW; Cha EJ; Kim NH; Kim DW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Dec; 30(8):641-50. PubMed ID: 19551766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audiologic disturbances in long-term mobile phone users.
Panda NK; Jain R; Bakshi J; Munjal S
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 20122338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students.
Mortazavi SM; Ahmadi J; Shariati M
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 May; 28(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 17330851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The health problems which can brougth by 3G cell phones to our country].
Enöz M
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 19857188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]