These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24500860)

  • 41. Ants can be used as bio-indicators to reveal biological effects of electromagnetic waves from some wireless apparatus.
    Cammaerts MC; Johansson O
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2014 Dec; 33(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 23977878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of the duration of exposure to the electromagnetic field emitted by mobile phones on human attention.
    Lee TM; Lam PK; Yee LT; Chan CC
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jul; 14(10):1361-4. PubMed ID: 12876474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Symptom attribution and risk perception in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance to electromagnetic fields and in the general population.
    van Dongen D; Smid T; Timmermans DR
    Perspect Public Health; 2014 May; 134(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 23912159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones.
    Rubin GJ; Cleare AJ; Wessely S
    J Psychosom Res; 2008 Jan; 64(1):1-9; discussion 11-2. PubMed ID: 18157992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones on the central nervous system.
    Hossmann KA; Hermann DM
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2003 Jan; 24(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 12483665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of generalization descriptions on risk perception.
    Freudenstein F; Boerner F; Croft RJ; Leung RWS; Loughran SP; Wiedemann PM
    Environ Res; 2023 Apr; 223():115422. PubMed ID: 36738768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones.
    Hillert L; Ahlbom A; Neasham D; Feychting M; Järup L; Navin R; Elliott P
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 16670713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of 900 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on electrocardiograms of guinea pigs.
    Meral I; Tekintangac Y; Demir H
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 33(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 24220873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Cellular radio systems. Problems faced in assessing exposure to electromagnetic fields].
    Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2000; 51(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10971929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Electromagnetic interference with infusion pumps from GSM mobile phones.
    Calcagnini G; Floris M; Censi F; Cianfanelli P; Scavino G; Bartolini P
    Health Phys; 2006 Apr; 90(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 16538140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Cellular phones and cancer: current status].
    Colonna A
    Bull Cancer; 2005 Jul; 92(7):637-43. PubMed ID: 16123002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Cell phone communication: hygienic characteristics, biological action, standardization (a review)].
    Gudina MV; Volkotrub LP
    Gig Sanit; 2010; (4):38-42. PubMed ID: 20873268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields.
    Frei P; Mohler E; Neubauer G; Theis G; Bürgi A; Fröhlich J; Braun-Fahrländer C; Bolte J; Egger M; Röösli M
    Environ Res; 2009 Aug; 109(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 19476932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mobile phone radiation and the risk of cancer; a review.
    Abdus-salam A; Elumelu T; Adenipekun A
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2008 Jun; 37(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 18939393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Risk governance for mobile phones, power lines, and other EMF technologies.
    Kheifets L; Swanson J; Kandel S; Malloy TF
    Risk Anal; 2010 Oct; 30(10):1481-94. PubMed ID: 20723143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. How dangerous are mobile phones, transmission masts, and electricity pylons?
    Wood AW
    Arch Dis Child; 2006 Apr; 91(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 16551794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure.
    Behari J
    Indian J Exp Biol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):959-81. PubMed ID: 21299039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An old issue and a new look: electromagnetic hypersensitivity caused by radiations emitted by GSM mobile phones.
    Mortazavi SM; Mahbudi A; Atefi M; Bagheri Sh; Bahaedini N; Besharati A
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 22129944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mobile phones are given the all clear by UK group.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2014 Feb; 348():g1477. PubMed ID: 24518854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cell phones and electromagnetic interference revisited.
    Health Devices; 2006 Dec; 35(12):449-56. PubMed ID: 17300104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.