207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24502133)
1. [Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].
Gromiec JP; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Jankowska A; Czerczak S
Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):699-716. PubMed ID: 24502133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations.
Cherrie JW; Fransman W; Heussen GAH; Koppisch D; Jensen KA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 31936022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the Risk Assessment Approach of the REACH Legislation: A Case Study.
Landberg HE; Hedmer M; Westberg H; Tinnerberg H
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 30371750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Assessment of the Robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) Target Airborne Concentration Ranges 15 Years on, and Their Usefulness for Determining Control Measures.
Vaughan NP; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):270-283. PubMed ID: 28355421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendation of occupational exposure limits (2014-2015).
Japan Society for Occupational Health
J Occup Health; 2014; 56(5):401-20. PubMed ID: 25422057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Exposure Assessment Tools under REACH: Part I-Tier 1 Tools.
Lee EG; Lamb J; Savic N; Basinas I; Gasic B; Jung C; Kashon ML; Kim J; Tischer M; van Tongeren M; Vernez D; Harper M
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Feb; 63(2):218-229. PubMed ID: 30534938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental Assessment of Inhalation and Dermal Exposure to Chemicals During Industrial or Professional Activities in Relation to the Performance of ECETOC TRA.
Franken R; Kasiotis KM; Tsakirakis AN; Chartzala I; Anastasiadou P; Machera K; Fransman W; Gerritsen-Ebben RM; Spaan S
Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Nov; 64(9):944-958. PubMed ID: 32761049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
Schenk L
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm.
Tielemans E; Noy D; Schinkel J; Heussen H; Van Der Schaaf D; West J; Fransman W
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 18621742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of predictive dermal exposure to chemicals in the work environment].
Jankowska A; Czerczak S; Kupczewska-Dobecka M
Med Pr; 2017 Jun; 68(4):557-569. PubMed ID: 28638154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Lower Tier Exposure Tools Used for REACH: Comparison of Tools Estimates With Available Exposure Measurements.
van Tongeren M; Lamb J; Cherrie JW; MacCalman L; Basinas I; Hesse S
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Oct; 61(8):921-938. PubMed ID: 29028246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the TRA ECETOC model for inhalation workplace exposure to different organic solvents for selected process categories.
Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Czerczak S; Jakubowski M
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2011 Jun; 24(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 21537889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ART, Stoffenmanager, and TRA: A Systematic Comparison of Exposure Estimates Using the TREXMO Translation System.
Savic N; Gasic B; Vernez D
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Dec; 62(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 29267947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dangerous chemical substances--tools supporting occupational risk assessment].
Dobrzyńska E; Pośniak M
Med Pr; 2014; 65(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 25812397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guidelines for personal exposure monitoring of chemicals: Part V.
; Hashimoto H; Yamada K; Hori H; Kumagai S; Murata M; Nagoya T; Nakahara H; Mochida N
J Occup Health; 2018 May; 60(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 29669968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fractional and component composition of dust in the air of workplace at machinery enterprise].
Maĭ IV; Zagorodnov SIu; Maks AA
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (12):12-5. PubMed ID: 23461182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of predictive models for estimation of health care workers exposure to sevoflurane.
Jankowska A; Czerczak S; Kucharska M; Wesołowski W; Maciaszek P; Kupczewska-Dobecka M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 26693999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cross-validation and refinement of the Stoffenmanager as a first tier exposure assessment tool for REACH.
Schinkel J; Fransman W; Heussen H; Kromhout H; Marquart H; Tielemans E
Occup Environ Med; 2010 Feb; 67(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 19773280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Occupational exposure to hazardous agents in enterprises supervised by the State Sanitary Inspection].
Kozajda A; Zielińska-Jankiewicz K
Med Pr; 2003; 54(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 14669573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
