207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24502133)
21. OELs derivation in Poland and in the former Eastern Bloc with reference to approaches and practices applied in the EU.
Soćko R; Czerczak S; Kupczewska-Dobecka M
Med Pr; 2015; 66(3):383-92. PubMed ID: 26325051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.
Spinazzè A; Borghi F; Campagnolo D; Rovelli S; Keller M; Fanti G; Cattaneo A; Cavallo DM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31382456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of recommended REACH exposure modeling tools and near-field, far-field model in assessing occupational exposure to toluene from spray paint.
Hofstetter E; Spencer JW; Hiteshew K; Coutu M; Nealley M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Mar; 57(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 23002273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Quantitative Exposure Models for Occupational Exposure to Organic Solvents in Korea.
Lee S; Lee K; Kim H
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Feb; 63(2):197-217. PubMed ID: 30445617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapor degreasing and bag filling operations.
Jones RM; Nicas M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 16172141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of exposure to TDI and MDI during polyurethane foam production in Poland using integrated theoretical and experimental data.
Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Czerczak S; Brzeźnicki S
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Sep; 34(2):512-518. PubMed ID: 22809748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Occupational Health Risk Assessment in the Electronics Industry in China Based on the Occupational Classification Method and EPA Model.
Cai Y; Li F; Zhang J; Wu Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30241294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing REACH Chemical Safety Assessment information with practice-a case-study of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in floor coating in The Netherlands.
Spee T; Huizer D
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Oct; 220(7):1190-1194. PubMed ID: 28711304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy Evaluation of Three Modelling Tools for Occupational Exposure Assessment.
Spinazzè A; Lunghini F; Campagnolo D; Rovelli S; Locatelli M; Cattaneo A; Cavallo DM
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Apr; 61(3):284-298. PubMed ID: 28355416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
Topping M
Occup Environ Med; 2001 Feb; 58(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 11160994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Methods of establishing occupational and environmental hygienic norms].
Czerczak S; Indulski JA; Kowalski Z; Szymczak W
Med Pr; 1994; 45(3 Suppl 2):1-88. PubMed ID: 7823802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of RPE-Select: A Web-Based Respiratory Protective Equipment Selector Tool.
Vaughan N; Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah B; Atkinson R
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Aug; 60(7):900-12. PubMed ID: 27286763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Problems concerning the integration of "derived-no-effect-levels" (DNELS) into occupational safety and health regulations].
Gromiec J
Med Pr; 2008; 59(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18663897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Guidelines for personal exposure monitoring of chemicals: Part III.
; Hashimoto H; Yamada K; Hori H; Kumagai S; Murata M; Nagoya T; Nakahara H; Mochida N
J Occup Health; 2018 Jan; 60(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 29213012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of COSHH essentials: methylene chloride, isopropanol, and acetone exposures in a small printing plant.
Lee EG; Harper M; Bowen RB; Slaven J
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):463-74. PubMed ID: 19435980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of the COSHH Essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer.
Lee EG; Slaven J; Bowen RB; Harper M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jan; 55(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21047985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The state of working conditions in light of control recommendations issued by the State Labor Inspectorate--selected problems].
Zajac T
Med Pr; 2002; 53(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 12051154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Exposure assessment to mercury vapor in chloralkali industry.
Mniszek W
Environ Monit Assess; 2001 May; 68(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 11411145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data.
Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U
Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Oct; 47(7):557-69. PubMed ID: 14530182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application of predictive model to estimate concentrations of chemical substances in the work environment].
Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Czerczak S; Jakubowski M; Maciaszek P; Janasik B
Med Pr; 2010; 61(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20677430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
