These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24502133)

  • 41. [Validation of measurement methods and estimation of uncertainty of measurement of chemical agents in the air at workstations].
    Dobecki M
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 23394013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Chemical exposure and risk assessment at workplaces--modeling approach.
    Mäkinen M; Hämäläinen M; Forsman K; Liesivuori J
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Nov; 17(11):744-9. PubMed ID: 12419101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Should control measures be based on air measurements or biological/biological effect monitoring?
    Harrison J; Sepai O
    Occup Med (Lond); 2000 Jan; 50(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 10795396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sensitivity analysis, dominant factors, and robustness of the ECETOC TRA v3, Stoffenmanager 4.5, and ART 1.5 occupational exposure models.
    Riedmann RA; Gasic B; Vernez D
    Risk Anal; 2015 Feb; 35(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 25616198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. 'Stoffenmanager', a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model.
    Marquart H; Heussen H; Le Feber M; Noy D; Tielemans E; Schinkel J; West J; Van Der Schaaf D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):429-41. PubMed ID: 18587140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of Exposure Assessment Tools under REACH: Part II-Higher Tier Tools.
    Lee EG; Lamb J; Savic N; Basinas I; Gasic B; Jung C; Kashon ML; Kim J; Tischer M; van Tongeren M; Vernez D; Harper M
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Feb; 63(2):230-241. PubMed ID: 30535049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Between-User Reliability of Tier 1 Exposure Assessment Tools Used Under REACH.
    Lamb J; Galea KS; Miller BG; Hesse S; Van Tongeren M
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Oct; 61(8):939-953. PubMed ID: 29028258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does industry take the susceptible subpopulation of asthmatic individuals into consideration when setting derived no-effect levels?
    Johansson MK; Johanson G; Öberg M; Schenk L
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 36(11):1379-91. PubMed ID: 27283874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of the control banding method--comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment.
    Hashimoto H; Goto T; Nakachi N; Suzuki H; Takebayashi T; Kajiki S; Mori K
    J Occup Health; 2007 Nov; 49(6):482-92. PubMed ID: 18075208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A structured strategy for assessing chemical risks, suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises.
    Balsat A; de Graeve J; Mairiaux P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Oct; 47(7):549-56. PubMed ID: 14530181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Recommendation of occupational exposure limits (2007-2008).
    Japan Society for Occupational Health
    J Occup Health; 2007 Jul; 49(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 17708058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
    Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Guidelines for personal exposure monitoring of chemicals: Part IV.
    ; Hashimoto H; Yamada K; Hori H; Kumagai S; Murata M; Nagoya T; Nakahara H; Mochida N
    J Occup Health; 2018 Mar; 60(2):103-110. PubMed ID: 29386490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates.
    Bekker C; Voogd E; Fransman W; Vermeulen R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Nov; 60(9):1039-1048. PubMed ID: 27637557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Setting limit values for chemical substances in the workplace: DNEL(INH) setting according to REACH principles following the example of 2-butyne-1,4-diol].
    Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Swiercz R
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 19999038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Assessment of the suitability of selected non-measuring models for dermal exposure estimation for the purposes of assessing compliance of working conditions with restrictions 71 and 76 in Annex XVII of the REACH regulation].
    Klimecka A; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Konieczko K; Jurewicz J
    Med Pr; 2023 Dec; 74(6):487-500. PubMed ID: 38160422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Advances in Inhalation Dosimetry Models and Methods for Occupational Risk Assessment and Exposure Limit Derivation.
    Kuempel ED; Sweeney LM; Morris JB; Jarabek AM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S18-40. PubMed ID: 26551218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Occupational exposure to selected isocyanates in Polish industry.
    Brzeźnicki S; Bonczarowska M
    Med Pr; 2015; 66(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 26325042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Surface wipe sampling for antineoplastic (chemotherapy) and other hazardous drug residue in healthcare settings: Methodology and recommendations.
    Connor TH; Zock MD; Snow AH
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Sep; 13(9):658-67. PubMed ID: 27019141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice.
    Kuempel ED; Geraci CL; Schulte PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):491-505. PubMed ID: 22752094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.