These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24502654)

  • 1. Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing--thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Delgado-Peña J; Maté-Sánchez JE; Mareque Bueno J; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Romanos GE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jul; 26(7):753-60. PubMed ID: 24502654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crestal bone loss minimized when following the crestal preparation protocol: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Novaes AB; de Oliveira RR; Taba Júnior M; de Souza SL; Palioto DB; Grisi MF; Papalexiou V
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):276-82. PubMed ID: 16447900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs.
    Negri B; Calvo-Guirado JL; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Maté Sánchez-de Val J; Guardia J; Muñoz-Guzón F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):236-244. PubMed ID: 22092544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; López-López PJ; Mate Sanchez JE; Gargallo Albiol J; Velasco Ortega E; Delgado Ruiz R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1286-1294. PubMed ID: 24118345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in crestal bone-to-implant contact following an under-drilling compared to an over-drilling protocol. A study in the rabbit tibia.
    Cohen O; Ormianer Z; Tal H; Rothamel D; Weinreb M; Moses O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2475-2480. PubMed ID: 26931772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs.
    Negri B; Calvo-Guirado JL; Pardo-Zamora G; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Delgado-Ruíz RA; Muñoz-Guzón F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 21435017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of bone condensation and crestal preparation on the bone response to implants designed for immediate loading: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
    de Oliveira RR; Novaes AB; Taba M; de Souza SL; Papalexiou V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 17340898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone Healing Around Dental Implants: Simplified vs Conventional Drilling Protocols at Speed of 400 rpm.
    Gil LF; Sarendranath A; Neiva R; Marão HF; Tovar N; Bonfante EA; Janal MN; Castellano A; Coelho PG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):329-336. PubMed ID: 28291851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Narrow- versus mini-implants at crestal and subcrestal bone levels. Experimental study in beagle dogs at three months.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Pérez-Albacete C; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; de Val Maté-Sánchez JE; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Abboud M; Velasco E; Gómez-Moreno G; Romanos GE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25502342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gomez-Moreno G; Guardia J; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Mate-Sanchez de Val JE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):826-30. PubMed ID: 23551427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multistepped Drill Design for Single-Stage Implant Site Preparation: Experimental Study in Type 2 Bone.
    Abboud M; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Kucine A; Rugova S; Balanta J; Calvo-Guirado JL
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():e472-85. PubMed ID: 25263993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crestal bone remodeling around implants placed using a short drilling protocol.
    Bratu E; Mihali S; Shapira L; Bratu DC; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):435-40. PubMed ID: 25506640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crestal bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. A pilot study in Foxhound dogs.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Boquete-Castro A; Negri B; Delgado Ruiz R; Gómez-Moreno G; Iezzi G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Mar; 25(3):344-351. PubMed ID: 23346955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biologic width changes around loaded implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone: histometric evaluation in canine mandible.
    Pontes AE; Ribeiro FS; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Cirelli JA; Marcantonio E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 18371095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In Vitro Assessment with the Infrared Thermometer of Temperature Differences Generated During Implant Site Preparation: The Traditional Technique Versus the Single-Drill Technique.
    Lucchiari N; Frigo AC; Stellini E; Coppe M; Berengo M; Bacci C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):182-91. PubMed ID: 25040939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alveolar Ridge Expansion: Comparison of Osseodensification and Conventional Osteotome Techniques.
    Tian JH; Neiva R; Coelho PG; Witek L; Tovar NM; Lo IC; Gil LF; Torroni A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):607-610. PubMed ID: 30507887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons between Bio-Oss(®) and Straumann(®) Bone Ceramic in immediate and staged implant placement in dogs mandible bone defects.
    Antunes AA; Oliveira Neto P; de Santis E; Caneva M; Botticelli D; Salata LA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 22168758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
    Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
    J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of implant diameter on osseointegration utilizing simplified drilling protocols.
    Jimbo R; Janal MN; Marin C; Giro G; Tovar N; Coelho PG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1295-1300. PubMed ID: 25040139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant Stability Quotients of Osteotome Bone Expansion and Conventional Drilling Technique for 4.1 mm Diameter Implant at Posterior Mandible.
    Hong HH; Hong A; Yang LY; Chang WY; Huang YF; Lin YT
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 27665748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.