288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24502761)
21. Evaluation of Direct PCR Amplification Using Various Swabs and Washing Reagents.
Altshuler H; Roy R
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1542-52. PubMed ID: 26331283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Collection techniques of touch DNA deposited on human skin following a strangulation scenario.
Alketbi SK
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 37278841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms.
Wise NM; Wagner SJ; Worst TJ; Sprague JE; Oechsle CM
Microbiologyopen; 2021 Nov; 10(6):e1244. PubMed ID: 34964289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preliminary investigation of differential tapelifting for sampling forensically relevant layered deposits.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26152832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Investigation into ethylene oxide treatment and residuals on DNA and downstream DNA analysis.
Wilson-Wilde L; Yakovchyts D; Neville S; Maynard P; Gunn P
Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 28063580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.
Dalmaso G; Bini M; Paroni R; Ferrari M
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18661868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [A foldable cardboard box for drying and storage of by cotton swab collected biological samples].
Hochmeister M; Rudin O; Meier R; Peccioli M; Borer U; Eisenberg A; Nagy R; Dirnhofer R
Arch Kriminol; 1997; 200(3-4):113-20. PubMed ID: 9446522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical forensic sample collection techniques following consensual intercourse in volunteers - cervical canal brush compared to conventional swabs.
Joki-Erkkilä M; Tuomisto S; Seppänen M; Huhtala H; Ahola A; Rainio J; Karhunen PJ
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Oct; 27():50-4. PubMed ID: 25287800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of NucleoSpin® Forensic Filters on DNA recovery from trace DNA swabs.
Heathfield LJ; Hitewa AN; Gibbon A; Mole CG
Sci Justice; 2022 May; 62(3):284-287. PubMed ID: 35598922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.
Tozzo P; Mazzobel E; Marcante B; Delicati A; Caenazzo L
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 36555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.
Zieger M; Defaux PM; Utz S
Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 26753871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of performance of genetics 4N6 FLOQSwabs™ with or without surfactant to rayon swabs.
Frippiat C; Noel F
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Aug; 42():96-9. PubMed ID: 27314974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
