These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24503299)

  • 1. Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers' ratings of plain and branded cigarette packaging: an experimental study.
    Guillaumier A; Bonevski B; Paul C; Durkin S; D'Este C
    BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004078. PubMed ID: 24503299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes?
    Wakefield M; Germain D; Durkin S; Hammond D; Goldberg M; Borland R
    Addiction; 2012 Jun; 107(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 22372966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.
    Mutti S; Hammond D; Reid JL; White CM; Thrasher JF
    Health Promot Int; 2017 Aug; 32(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 26826368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom.
    Hammond D; Daniel S; White CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Feb; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23332478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.
    McNeill A; Gravely S; Hitchman SC; Bauld L; Hammond D; Hartmann-Boyce J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011244. PubMed ID: 28447363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e014099. PubMed ID: 28093441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pictorial warning label message framing and standardized packaging on cigarette packaging appeal among young adult smokers.
    Johnson AC; Luta G; Tercyak KP; Niaura RS; Mays D
    Addict Behav; 2021 Sep; 120():106951. PubMed ID: 33895661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of premium vs masked cigarette brand names on the experienced taste of a cigarette after tobacco plain packaging in Australia: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 29526164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.
    White CM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Fong GT
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():737. PubMed ID: 22943135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of plain packaging and health warning labels for cannabis among young adults: findings from an experimental study.
    Mutti-Packer S; Collyer B; Hodgins DC
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1361. PubMed ID: 30526539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardised packs and larger health warnings: visual attention and perceptions among Colombian smokers and non-smokers.
    Sillero-Rejon C; Mahmoud O; Tamayo RM; Clavijo-Alvarez AA; Adams S; Maynard OM
    Addiction; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 34882868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study.
    Wakefield MA; Hayes L; Durkin S; Borland R
    BMJ Open; 2013; 3(7):. PubMed ID: 23878174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of first exposure to plain cigarette packaging on smoking behaviour and attitudes: a randomised controlled study.
    Maynard OM; Leonards U; Attwood AS; Bauld L; Hogarth L; Munafò MR
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Mar; 15():240. PubMed ID: 25880278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of Fully Branded and Standardized e-Cigarette Packaging With Interest in Trying Products Among Youths and Adults in Great Britain.
    Taylor E; Arnott D; Cheeseman H; Hammond D; Reid JL; McNeill A; Driezen P; East K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e231799. PubMed ID: 36917111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Australia's introduction of tobacco plain packs on adult smokers' pack-related perceptions and responses: results from a continuous tracking survey.
    Dunlop SM; Dobbins T; Young JM; Perez D; Currow DC
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005836. PubMed ID: 25524542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey.
    Scheffels J; Lund I
    BMJ Open; 2013 Dec; 3(12):e003732. PubMed ID: 24309171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms underlying visual attention to health warnings on branded and plain cigarette packs.
    Maynard OM; Brooks JC; Munafò MR; Leonards U
    Addiction; 2017 Apr; 112(4):662-672. PubMed ID: 27886656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():1005. PubMed ID: 24156515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.