These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women. Leslie WD; Brennan SL; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23929269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry. Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA Osteoporos Int; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2557-2564. PubMed ID: 28593449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos. Fraser LA; Langsetmo L; Berger C; Ioannidis G; Goltzman D; Adachi JD; Papaioannou A; Josse R; Kovacs CS; Olszynski WP; Towheed T; Hanley DA; Kaiser SM; Prior J; Jamal S; Kreiger N; Brown JP; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA; Leslie WD; Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):829-37. PubMed ID: 21161508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction? Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA; J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1243-51. PubMed ID: 22392538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes. Giangregorio LM; Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA J Bone Miner Res; 2012 Feb; 27(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 22052532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there an interaction between socioeconomic status and FRAX 10-year fracture probability determined with and without bone density measures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study of female cohort. Brennan SL; Quirk SE; Hosking SM; Kotowicz MA; Holloway KL; Moloney DJ; Dobbins AG; Pasco JA Calcif Tissue Int; 2015 Feb; 96(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 25578145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women. Tebé Cordomí C; Del Río LM; Di Gregorio S; Casas L; Estrada MD; Kotzeva A; Espallargues M J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 22748778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FREM predicts 10-year incident fracture risk independent of FRAX® probability: a registry-based cohort study. Leslie WD; Möller S; Skjødt MK; Yan L; Abrahamsen B; Lix LM; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Harvey NC; Kanis JA; Rubin KH Osteoporos Int; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1457-1463. PubMed ID: 35175395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Administrative healthcare data applied to fracture risk assessment. Yang S; Leslie WD; Morin SN; Lix LM Osteoporos Int; 2019 Mar; 30(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 30554259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX®, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study. Rubin KH; Abrahamsen B; Friis-Holmberg T; Hjelmborg JV; Bech M; Hermann AP; Barkmann R; Glüer CC; Brixen K Bone; 2013 Sep; 56(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23669650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of FRAX in clinical practice according to sex and osteoporosis definitions: the Manitoba BMD registry. Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Morin SN; Lix LM; Schousboe JT; Ensrud KE; Johansson H; McCloskey EV; Kanis JA Osteoporos Int; 2018 Mar; 29(3):759-767. PubMed ID: 29404625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absolute fracture risk assessment using lumbar spine and femoral neck bone density measurements: derivation and validation of a hybrid system. Leslie WD; Lix LM; J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Mar; 26(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 20839285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]