These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24504195)

  • 1. Agency attribution: event-related potentials and outcome monitoring.
    Bednark JG; Franz EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 232(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 24504195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one's actions.
    Synofzik M; Thier P; Leube DT; Schlotterbeck P; Lindner A
    Brain; 2010 Jan; 133(Pt 1):262-71. PubMed ID: 19995870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right parietotemporal activity predicts sense of agency under uncertain delays of sensory outcomes.
    Rashidi M; Schmitgen MM; Weisbrod M; Schnell K; Wolf RC; Whittington MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Mar; 125(3):903-914. PubMed ID: 33566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creating a movement heuristic for voluntary action: electrophysiological correlates of movement-outcome learning.
    Bednark JG; Reynolds JN; Stafford T; Redgrave P; Franz EA
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 22245144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for self-positivity bias in a subliminal self-cue: An event-related potential study.
    Xia R; Shao H; Cui L; Zhang P; Xue J; Zhou A; Li S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Jan; 744():135625. PubMed ID: 33421488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Confusion within feedback control between cognitive and sensorimotor agency cues in self-other attribution.
    Miyawaki Y; Morioka S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3957-3972. PubMed ID: 32935291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I did it: unconscious expectation of sensory consequences modulates the experience of self-agency and its functional signature.
    Gentsch A; Schütz-Bosbach S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):3817-28. PubMed ID: 21452945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of agency in human reward processing.
    Hassall CD; Hajcak G; Krigolson OE
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 19(6):1458-1466. PubMed ID: 31187443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of action-outcome contingency on motivation from control.
    Penton T; Wang X; Coll MP; Catmur C; Bird G
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 236(12):3239-3249. PubMed ID: 30218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disappearance of self-serving bias: Reward positivity reflects performance monitoring modulated by responsibility attribution in a two-person cooperative task.
    Li P; Yin H; Xu H; Lei Y; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Nov; 133():17-27. PubMed ID: 30205120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Illusory agency attribution to others performing actions similar to one's own.
    Nomura O; Ogata T; Miyake Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10754. PubMed ID: 31341218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring.
    Beyer F; Sidarus N; Bonicalzi S; Haggard P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 12(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 27803288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attribution of movement: Potential links between subjective reports of agency and output monitoring.
    Sugimori E; Asai T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):900-16. PubMed ID: 25385077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of sensory predictions determines the experience of self-agency.
    Gentsch A; Kathmann N; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 228(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 22212711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural substrates for judgment of self-agency in ambiguous situations.
    Fukushima H; Goto Y; Maeda T; Kato M; Umeda S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72267. PubMed ID: 23977268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doing good or bad: How interactions between action and emotion expectations shape the sense of agency.
    Gentsch A; Weiss C; Spengler S; Synofzik M; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Soc Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 10(4):418-30. PubMed ID: 25644692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit agency in observed actions: evidence for N1 suppression of tones caused by self-made and observed actions.
    Poonian SK; McFadyen J; Ogden J; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 27(4):752-64. PubMed ID: 25321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the unknown: Novelty processing depends on expectations.
    Schomaker J; Meeter M
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1694():140-148. PubMed ID: 29758180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Violating body movement semantics: Neural signatures of self-generated and external-generated errors.
    Padrao G; Gonzalez-Franco M; Sanchez-Vives MV; Slater M; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):147-156. PubMed ID: 26282856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neurophysiological evidence for evaluative feedback processing depending on goal relevance.
    Severo MC; Paul K; Walentowska W; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116857. PubMed ID: 32304885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.