These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24504292)

  • 1. Reporting of sources of funding in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh M; Zanicotti DG
    Br Dent J; 2014 Feb; 216(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 24504292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M
    J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey.
    Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22220771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: a systematic approach.
    Popelut A; Valet F; Fromentin O; Thomas A; Bouchard P
    PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10274. PubMed ID: 20422000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Wu YC; Scheidgen M; Tu YK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0139030. PubMed ID: 26422698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
    Liu Y; Yang S; Dai J; Xu Y; Zhang R; Jiang H; Yan X; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28130. PubMed ID: 22174772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Page MJ; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Tricco AC; Catalá-López F; Li L; Reid EK; Sarkis-Onofre R; Moher D
    PLoS Med; 2016 May; 13(5):e1002028. PubMed ID: 27218655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics.
    Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Page MJ; Tricco AC; Moher D; Sarkis-Onofre R
    J Dent; 2019 Mar; 82():71-84. PubMed ID: 30716451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on Oral Implants Placed Immediately into Fresh Extraction Sockets.
    Atieh MA; Duncan WJ; Faggion CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 26478967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.
    Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
    Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.
    Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reporting quality of meta-analysis results of systematic review abstracts in periodontology and implant dentistry is suboptimal.
    Polychronopoulou A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2014 Dec; 14(4):209-10. PubMed ID: 25488877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.