These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24504292)

  • 21. Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry.
    Dos Santos MBF; Agostini BA; Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Sarkis-Onofre R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):57. PubMed ID: 32160871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Epidemiology of systematic reviews in imaging journals: evaluation of publication trends and sustainability?
    Alabousi M; Alabousi A; McGrath TA; Cobey KD; Budhram B; Frank RA; Nguyen F; Salameh JP; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):517-526. PubMed ID: 30051140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Wu IXY; Deng Y; Wang H; Chen Y; Wong CHL; Chung VCH
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Aug; 17(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 32383967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping.
    Chaabna K; Cheema S; Abraham A; Alrouh H; Mamtani R; Sheikh JI
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):94. PubMed ID: 30021616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Which type of soft tissue augmentation at dental implant sites is best supported by evidence?
    Ali K; Kay EJ
    Evid Based Dent; 2020 Dec; 21(4):140-141. PubMed ID: 33339977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs).
    Turner L; Galipeau J; Garritty C; Manheimer E; Wieland LS; Yazdi F; Moher D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53536. PubMed ID: 23341949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines.
    Scott J; Howard B; Sinnett P; Schiesel M; Baker J; Henderson P; Vassar M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1828-1835. PubMed ID: 28623004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Publication bias in five dental implant journals: an observation from 2005 to 2009.
    Yuan JC; Shyamsunder N; Barao VA; Lee DJ; Sukotjo C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 22010086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
    Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Bow S; Klassen J; Chisholm A; Tjosvold L; Thomson D; Klassen TP; Moher D; Hartling L
    BMC Pediatr; 2010 May; 10():34. PubMed ID: 20487565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical research in implant dentistry: study design, reporting and outcome measurements: consensus report of Working Group 2 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology.
    Tonetti M; Palmer R;
    J Clin Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 39 Suppl 12():73-80. PubMed ID: 22533948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published 1991-2012: cross sectional study.
    Saltaji H; Cummings GG; Armijo-Olivo S; Major MP; Amin M; Major PW; Hartling L; Flores-Mir C
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74545. PubMed ID: 24098657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in the reporting of conflicts of interest and sponsorships in systematic reviews with meta-analyses in dentistry: an examination of factors associated with their reporting.
    Heymann J; Su N; Faggion CM
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2024 Sep; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 39350298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.