These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24505361)

  • 21. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consequences of severe habitat fragmentation on density, genetics, and spatial capture-recapture analysis of a small bear population.
    Murphy SM; Augustine BC; Ulrey WA; Guthrie JM; Scheick BK; McCown JW; Cox JJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181849. PubMed ID: 28738077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the precision and sensitivity of density estimates obtained with a camera-trap method revealed limitations and opportunities.
    Pettigrew P; Sigouin D; St-Laurent MH
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(12):7879-7889. PubMed ID: 34188858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial capture-recapture design and modelling for the study of small mammals.
    Romairone J; Jiménez J; Luque-Larena JJ; Mougeot F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198766. PubMed ID: 29879211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimization of capture-recapture monitoring of elusive species illustrated with a threatened grasshopper.
    Bröder L; Tatin L; Hochkirch A; Schuld A; Pabst L; Besnard A
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):743-753. PubMed ID: 31825105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A spatial open-population capture-recapture model.
    Efford MG; Schofield MR
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 31517386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental evaluation of spatial capture-recapture study design.
    Fleming J; Grant EHC; Sterrett SC; Sutherland C
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02419. PubMed ID: 34278637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved inferences about landscape connectivity from spatial capture-recapture by integration of a movement model.
    Dupont G; Linden DW; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3544. PubMed ID: 34626121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correction: Trap Configuration and Spacing Influences Parameter Estimates in Spatial Capture-Recapture Models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0141634. PubMed ID: 26496076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models.
    Sun CC; Royle JA; Fuller AK
    Ecology; 2019 Sep; 100(9):e02777. PubMed ID: 31168779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.
    Nawaz MA; Khan BU; Mahmood A; Younas M; Din JU; Sutherland C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13104. PubMed ID: 34162926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing tiger population dynamics using photographic capture-recapture sampling.
    Karanth KU; Nichols JD; Kumar NS; Hines JE
    Ecology; 2006 Nov; 87(11):2925-37. PubMed ID: 17168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of hoop-net trapping and visual surveys to monitor abundance of the Rio Grande cooter (
    Mali I; Duarte A; Forstner MRJ
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4677. PubMed ID: 29770271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficient spatial multi-state capture-recapture model to study natal dispersal: An application to the Alpine marmot.
    Dupont P; Allainé D; Ferrandiz-Rovira M; Pradel R
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Jan; 91(1):266-278. PubMed ID: 34743354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study.
    Alonso RS; McClintock BT; Lyren LM; Boydston EE; Crooks KR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123032. PubMed ID: 25822245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.