These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24505831)

  • 1. Teva v. Eisai: what's the real "controversy"?
    Wang GL
    Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(4):631-54, iii. PubMed ID: 24505831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The balance between innovation and competition: the Hatch-Waxman Act, the 2003 Amendments, and beyond.
    Kelly C
    Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(3):417-78, iii. PubMed ID: 24505856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
    Carrier MA
    Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Administrative Meter Maid: Using Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review to Curb Exclusivity Parking via the "Failure to Market" Provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.
    Apel BT
    Mich Law Rev; 2015; 114(1):107-36. PubMed ID: 26394458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent trends in brand-name and generic drug competition.
    Grabowski H; Long G; Mortimer R
    J Med Econ; 2014 Mar; 17(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 24320785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984: fine-tuning the balance between the interests of pioneer and generic drug manufacturers.
    Soehnge H
    Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(1):51-80. PubMed ID: 12739584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Branded drug reformulation: the next brand vs. generic antitrust battleground.
    Amoresano GV
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17444032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brand-name drug manufacturers risk antitrust violations by slowing generic production through patent layering.
    Paine CS
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 12715807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Updated trends in US brand-name and generic drug competition.
    Grabowski H; Long G; Mortimer R; Boyo A
    J Med Econ; 2016 Sep; 19(9):836-44. PubMed ID: 27064194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revitalizing the patent system to incentivize pharmaceutical innovation: the potential of claims with means-plus-function clauses.
    Tang WL
    Duke Law J; 2013 Feb; 62(5):1069-108. PubMed ID: 25330553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bib Pharma Monopoly: Why Consumers Keep Landing on "Park Place" and How the Game is Rigged.
    Levy MS
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2016; 66(1):247-303. PubMed ID: 28225582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The emerging effects of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984.
    Lewis RA
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():361-78. PubMed ID: 10118987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pharmaceutical patent settlements: the antitrust risks.
    Balto DA
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 11824464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy on 180-day marketing exclusivity for drugs marketed under abbreviated new drug applications; clarification--FDA. Clarification.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Nov; 62(229):63268-9. PubMed ID: 10177950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Settlements between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies: a reasonable antitrust analysis of reverse payments.
    Yvon AM
    Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Dec; 75(3):1883-912. PubMed ID: 17312596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A generic problem.
    Hanauer SB
    Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):649. PubMed ID: 17130869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The "reverse payment paradox": an overview of the legality of reverse exclusionary payments in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Brockmeier MS
    Health Care Law Mon; 2010 Mar; 2010(3):2-10. PubMed ID: 20329564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies That Delay Market Entry of Generic Drugs.
    Vokinger KN; Kesselheim AS; Avorn J; Sarpatwari A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2017 Nov; 177(11):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 28975217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delaying generic competition--corporate payoffs and the future of Plavix.
    Shuchman M
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Sep; 355(13):1297-300. PubMed ID: 17005945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolving brand-name and generic drug competition may warrant a revision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.
    Grabowski HG; Kyle M; Mortimer R; Long G; Kirson N
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Nov; 30(11):2157-66. PubMed ID: 22068409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.