These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24505961)

  • 21. Maternal reactions to two-dimensional compared to three-dimensional foetal ultrasonography.
    Edwards MM; Wang F; Tejura T; Patel A; Majewski S; Donnenfeld AE
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 31(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 20441410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. First-trimester pregnancy scanning as a screening tool for high-risk and abnormal pregnancies in a district general hospital setting.
    Drysdale K; Ridley D; Walker K; Higgins B; Dean T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Mar; 22(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 12521697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Routine ultrasound examination during pregnancy: a world of possibilities.
    Molander E; Alehagen S; Berterö CM
    Midwifery; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 18571818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Ultrasound examinations in the context of suspected fetal malformations: satisfaction of concerned women and their appraisals].
    Götzmann L; Schönholzer SM; Kölble N; Klaghofer R; Scheuer E; Huch R; Buddeberg C; Zimmermann R
    Ultraschall Med; 2002 Feb; 23(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11842369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
    García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e837-43. PubMed ID: 22079009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient acceptance of endovaginal ultrasound.
    Bennett CC; Richards DS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 10776013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Presenting and discussing nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in the UK.
    Pilnick AM; Fraser DM; James DK
    Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 15020030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy.
    Bega G; Lev-Toaff A; Kuhlman K; Berghella V; Parker L; Goldberg B; Wapner R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 16(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 11169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. First-trimester Down syndrome screening: pregnant women's knowledge.
    Dahl K; Hvidman L; Jørgensen FS; Henriques C; Olesen F; Kjaergaard H; Kesmodel US
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 20878670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two sides of the same coin--an interview study of Swedish obstetricians' experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management.
    Åhman A; Persson M; Edvardsson K; Lalos A; Graner S; Small R; Mogren I
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Nov; 15():304. PubMed ID: 26589489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why women want prenatal ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
    Gudex C; Nielsen BL; Madsen M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 16435312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Women's perception of information and experiences of nuchal translucency screening in Greece.
    Gourounti K; Lykeridou K; Daskalakis G; Glentis S; Sandall J; Antsaklis A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 18648204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Fears of pregnant women if prenatal examination yields or does not yield any findings].
    Kowalcek I; Lammers C; Brunk J; Bieniakiewicz I; Gembruch U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Mar; 124(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12070797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Is early ultrasonography good for everyone?].
    Berg SF
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Aug; 132(14):1588-9. PubMed ID: 22875118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Routine obstetric ultrasound services.
    Walsh CA; McAuliffe F; Kinsella V; McParland P
    Ir Med J; 2013; 106(10):311-3. PubMed ID: 24579412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of risk in relation to ultrasound screening for Down's syndrome during pregnancy.
    Georgsson Ohman S; Grunewald C; Waldenström U
    Midwifery; 2009 Jun; 25(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 17920172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Women's expectations and intention to terminate pregnancy in case of abnormal findings at the second trimester level II ultrasound scan. A prospective, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey.
    Athanasiadis AP; Polychronou P; Mikos T; Pantazis K; Assimakopoulos E; Tzevelekis F; Bontis JN
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19521092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pregnant women's preference and factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization in Debra Markos Town, North West Ethiopia: a community based follow up study.
    Bayu H; Adefris M; Amano A; Abuhay M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Feb; 15():15. PubMed ID: 25652361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Worries surrounding the first ultrasound do not bias the screening for depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy.
    Quispel C; Bonsel GJ; Hoogendijk WJ; Lambregtse-van den Berg MP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 55(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 25339122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fetal abnormalities: evaluation with real-time-processible three-dimensional US--preliminary report.
    Baba K; Okai T; Kozuma S; Taketani Y
    Radiology; 1999 May; 211(2):441-6. PubMed ID: 10228526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.