136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506177)
1. Impacts of genotyping strategies on long-term genetic response in genomic selection.
Nishio M; Satoh M
Anim Sci J; 2014 May; 85(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 24506177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
Muir WM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient selection against categorically scored hip dysplasia in dogs is possible using best linear unbiased prediction and optimum contribution selection: a simulation study.
Malm S; Sørensen AC; Fikse WF; Strandberg E
J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Apr; 130(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23496016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.
Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4646-56. PubMed ID: 22818479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Response to selection while maximizing genetic variance in small populations.
Cervantes I; Gutiérrez JP; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):69. PubMed ID: 27649906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Competitive gene flow does not necessarily maximize the genetic gain of genomic breeding programs in the presence of genotype-by-environment interaction.
Cao L; Mulder HA; Liu H; Nielsen HM; S Rensen AC
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8122-8134. PubMed ID: 33934864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.
Haberland AM; Luther H; Hofer A; Tholen E; Simianer H; Lind B; Baes C
Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 24176119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
