These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506177)

  • 41. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Genomic selection in animal breeding programs.
    van der Werf J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():543-61. PubMed ID: 23756910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of Genomic Prediction Model, Selection Intensity, and Breeding Strategy on the Long-Term Genetic Gain and Genetic Erosion in Soybean Breeding.
    da Silva ÉDB; Xavier A; Faria MV
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():637133. PubMed ID: 34539725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Mc Hugh N; Meuwissen TH; Cromie AR; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4109-18. PubMed ID: 21787946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.
    Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving the analysis of low heritability complex traits for enhanced genetic gain in potato.
    Slater AT; Wilson GM; Cogan NO; Forster JW; Hayes BJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2014 Apr; 127(4):809-20. PubMed ID: 24374468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Opportunities for genome-wide selection for pig breeding in developing countries.
    Akanno EC; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M; Friendship RM; Robinson JA
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4617-27. PubMed ID: 24078617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.
    Hallander J; Waldmann P
    BMC Genet; 2009 Nov; 10():70. PubMed ID: 19895684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of Seven Tree Breeding Strategies Under Conditions of Inbreeding Depression.
    Wu HX; Hallingbäck HR; Sánchez L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 26739644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using recent versus complete pedigree data in genetic evaluation of a closed nucleus broiler line.
    Mehrabani-Yeganeh H; Gibson JP; Schaeffer LR
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jul; 78(7):937-41. PubMed ID: 10404672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China.
    Wei X; Zhang T; Wang L; Zhang L; Hou X; Yan H; Wang L
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():938947. PubMed ID: 35754832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value.
    Bijma P; Woolliams JA
    Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):361A-373. PubMed ID: 10978300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected.
    van der Werf JH; de Boer IJ
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Oct; 68(10):3124-32. PubMed ID: 2254191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Genetic analysis on the direct response to divergent selection for phytate phosphorus bioavailability in a randombred chicken population.
    Zhang W; Aggrey SE; Pesti GM; Bakalli RI; Edwards HM
    Poult Sci; 2005 Mar; 84(3):370-5. PubMed ID: 15782904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Multiple-trait breeding values for parental selection in self-pollinating crops.
    Bauer AM; Léon J
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Jan; 116(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 17955207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.