BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506419)

  • 1. Comparison of skin elasticity test results from the Ballistometer(®) and Cutometer(®).
    Woo MS; Moon KJ; Jung HY; Park SR; Moon TK; Kim NS; Lee BC
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 Nov; 20(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 24506419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of Cutometer area parameters for the study of human skin fatigue.
    Dobrev H
    Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 15807810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Cutometer area parameters in evaluating age-related changes in the skin elasticity of the cheek.
    Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Oyobikawa M; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Ishiko A; Kanto H
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e238-42. PubMed ID: 22650601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of skin firmness by the DynaSKIN, a novel non-contact compression device, and its use in revealing the efficacy of a skincare regimen featuring a novel anti-ageing ingredient, acetyl aspartic acid.
    Kearney EM; Messaraa C; Grennan G; Koeller G; Mavon A; Merinville E
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 May; 23(2):155-168. PubMed ID: 27546316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties.
    Smalls LK; Randall Wickett R; Visscher MO
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16420538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women.
    Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 23889488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of SkinFibrometer
    Kim MA; Kim EJ; Lee HK
    Skin Res Technol; 2018 Aug; 24(3):466-471. PubMed ID: 29405450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of the mechanical properties of skin with ballistometer and suction cup.
    Jemec GB; Selvaag E; Agren M; Wulf HC
    Skin Res Technol; 2001 May; 7(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 11393204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between a Cutometer and quantitative evaluation using Moire topography in age-related skin elasticity.
    Ahn S; Kim S; Lee H; Moon S; Chang I
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):280-4. PubMed ID: 17610649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related changes in skin mechanical properties: a quantitative evaluation of 120 female subjects.
    Krueger N; Luebberding S; Oltmer M; Streker M; Kerscher M
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 May; 17(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21281361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of age and regional differences on skin elasticity as measured by the Cutometer.
    Ryu HS; Joo YH; Kim SO; Park KC; Youn SW
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 19159383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two series of non-invasive instruments used for the skin physiological properties measurements: the 'Soft Plus' from Callegari S.p.A vs. the series of detectors from Courage & Khazaka.
    Hua W; Xie H; Chen T; Li L
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23772826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in skin bio-mechanical properties: the neck skin compared with the cheek and forearm skin in Korean females.
    Kim E; Cho G; Won NG; Cho J
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Aug; 19(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23441628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the elastic angle for quantitative and visible evaluation of skin elasticity in vivo.
    Myoung J; Jeong ET; Kim M; Lim JM; Kang NG; Park SG
    Skin Res Technol; 2021 Nov; 27(6):1017-1022. PubMed ID: 34080757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment.
    Draaijers LJ; Botman YA; Tempelman FR; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15019116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental and numerical analysis of soft tissue stiffness measurement using manual indentation device--significance of indentation geometry and soft tissue thickness.
    Iivarinen JT; Korhonen RK; Jurvelin JS
    Skin Res Technol; 2014 Aug; 20(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24267492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The seasonal variation in skin hydration, sebum, scaliness, brightness and elasticity in Korean females.
    Nam GW; Baek JH; Koh JS; Hwang JK
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 Feb; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24528115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the test area on the mechanical properties of skin.
    Piérard GE; Nikkels-Tassoudji N; Piérard-Franchimont C
    Dermatology; 1995; 191(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 8589499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects.
    Boyer G; Laquièze L; Le Bot A; Laquièze S; Zahouani H
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19152580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method for the visualization and quantification of internal skin elasticity by ultrasound imaging.
    Osanai O; Ohtsuka M; Hotta M; Kitaharai T; Takema Y
    Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21348895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.