These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506437)

  • 1. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar; 51(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 24506437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention.
    Koelewijn T; de Kluiver H; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():81-90. PubMed ID: 25732724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupil Dilation Reflects Perceptual Priorities During a Receptive Speech Task.
    Mechtenberg H; Giorio C; Myers EB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):425-440. PubMed ID: 37882091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y; Lehmann A; Deroche M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
    Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupillometry reveals differences in cognitive demands of listening to face mask-attenuated speech.
    Carraturo S; McLaughlin DJ; Peelle JE; Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Dec; 154(6):3973-3985. PubMed ID: 38149818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of hearing acuity on psychophysiological responses to effortful speech perception.
    Keur-Huizinga L; Huizinga NA; Zekveld AA; Versfeld NJ; van de Ven SRB; van Dijk WAJ; de Geus EJC; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109031. PubMed ID: 38761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Application of Pupillometry in Hearing Science to Assess Listening Effort.
    Naylor G; Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518799437. PubMed ID: 30208763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Copresence Was Found to Be Related to Some Pupil Measures in Persons With Hearing Loss While They Performed a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Pielage H; Plain BJ; Saunders GH; Versfeld NJ; Lunner T; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1190-1201. PubMed ID: 37012623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.