1162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506603)
21. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New possibilities for volumetric-modulated arc therapy using the Agility™ 160-leaf multileaf collimator.
Blümer N; Scherf C; Köhn J; Kara E; Loutfi-Krauß B; Imhoff D; Rödel C; Ramm U; Licher J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2014 Oct; 190(11):1066-74. PubMed ID: 25060175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.
Lin JF; Yeh DC; Yeh HL; Chang CF; Lin JC
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 26116150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Static and rotational intensity modulated techniques for head-neck cancer radiotherapy: a planning comparison.
Broggi S; Perna L; Bonsignore F; Rinaldin G; Fiorino C; Chiara A; Frigerio C; Butti I; Sangalli G; Dell'Oca I; Di Muzio N; Cattaneo GM; Declich F
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):973-9. PubMed ID: 25113943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of multi-leaf collimator leaf width in radiosurgery via volumetric modulated arc therapy and 3D dynamic conformal arc therapy.
Serna A; Puchades V; Mata F; Ramos D; Alcaraz M
Phys Med; 2015 May; 31(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 25703035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetric comparison between step-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for upper thoracic and cervical esophageal carcinoma.
Gao M; Li Q; Ning Z; Gu W; Huang J; Mu J; Pei H
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 26920244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Ning ZH; Mu JM; Jin JX; Li XD; Li QL; Gu WD; Huang J; Han Y; Pei HL
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Oct; 8():237. PubMed ID: 24125432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of gantry rotation time on plan quality and dosimetric verification--volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Pasler M; Wirtz H; Lutterbach J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2011 Dec; 187(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 22127360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dosimetric comparison of robotic- and LINAC-based treatment of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Acar H; Yazici O; Unal D
Med Dosim; 2022 Winter; 47(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 36180324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study of the dosimetric characteristics between different fixed-field IMRT and VMAT in early-stage primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.
Xu LM; Kang ML; Jiang B; Liu QF; Li YX
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28935521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.
Kantz S; Söhn M; Troeller A; Reiner M; Weingandt H; Alber M; Belka C; Ganswindt U
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():184. PubMed ID: 26328628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The inter- and intrafraction reproducibilities of three common IMRT delivery techniques.
Buckey CR; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4854-60. PubMed ID: 20964202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT.
Lu SH; Cheng JC; Kuo SH; Lee JJ; Chen LH; Wu JK; Chen YH; Chen WY; Wen SY; Chong FC; Wu CJ; Wang CW
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Sep; 104(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 22236614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical experience transitioning from IMRT to VMAT for head and neck cancer.
Studenski MT; Bar-Ad V; Siglin J; Cognetti D; Curry J; Tuluc M; Harrison AS
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 23246253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
