172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506652)
1. Mammographic compression after breast conserving therapy: controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):023501. PubMed ID: 24506652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Highnam R; Chan A; Böhm-Vélez M; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 25596915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.
de Groot JE; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJM
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 25554008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25783657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
Feder K; Grunert JH
Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography system.
den Boer D; Dam-Vervloet LAJ; Boomsma MF; de Boer E; van Dalen JA; Poot L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():251-254. PubMed ID: 30017290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy.
Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns.
Dustler M; Andersson I; Brorson H; Fröjd P; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Förnvik D
Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):973-80. PubMed ID: 22949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is short-interval mammography necessary after breast conservation surgery and radiation treatment in breast cancer patients?
Hymas RV; Gaffney DK; Parkinson BT; Belnap TW; Sause WT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 22245193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain.
Chida K; Komatsu Y; Sai M; Nakagami A; Yamada T; Yamashita T; Mori I; Ishibashi T; Maruoka S; Zuguchi M
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 19135922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer?
Adkisson CD; Bagaria SP; Parker AS; Bray JM; Gibson T; Thomas CS; Heckman MG; McLaughlin SA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):1129-36. PubMed ID: 21975859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do MRI and mammography reliably identify candidates for breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Jochelson MS; Lampen-Sachar K; Gibbons G; Dang C; Lake D; Morris EA; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 May; 22(5):1490-5. PubMed ID: 25777093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric breast density is essential for predicting cosmetic outcome at the late stage after breast-conserving surgery.
Shiina N; Sakakibara M; Fujisaki K; Iwase T; Nagashima T; Sangai T; Kubota Y; Akita S; Takishima H; Miyazaki M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 26852107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Clinical Utility and Cost of Postoperative Mammography Completed within One Year of Breast Conserving Therapy: Is It Worth It?
Allen A; Cauthen A; Vaughan J; Dale P
Am Surg; 2017 Aug; 83(8):871-874. PubMed ID: 28822394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.
Dahlbäck C; Ullmark JH; Rehn M; Ringberg A; Manjer J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):679-687. PubMed ID: 28536951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening.
Moshina N; Sagstad S; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Gran E; Music J; Hofvind S
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 32052779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast compression in mammography: how much is enough?
Poulos A; McLean D; Rickard M; Heard R
Australas Radiol; 2003 Jun; 47(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12780439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical standardisation of mammographic compression using Volpara software.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):789-794. PubMed ID: 33419655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
