BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24506815)

  • 1. Comparison of surgical technique (open vs. laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Busch J; Leva N; Schrader M; Deger S; Miller K; Lein M
    BMC Urol; 2014 Feb; 14():18. PubMed ID: 24506815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Rosen RC; Artibani W; Carroll PR; Costello A; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel VR; Stolzenburg JU; Van der Poel H; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 22749852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
    Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Artibani W; Cestari A; Galfano A; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Guillonneau B; Menon M; Montorsi F; Patel V; Rassweiler J; Van Poppel H
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1037-63. PubMed ID: 19185977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.
    Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Hashine K; Kakuda T; Iuchi S; Hosokawa T; Ninomiya I
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jan; 16(1):7. PubMed ID: 29304808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.
    Willis DL; Gonzalgo ML; Brotzman M; Feng Z; Trock B; Su LM
    BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 21933328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.
    Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel MB; Orvieto MA; Chauhan S; Ficarra V; Melegari S; Palmer KJ; Patel VR
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):2003-15. PubMed ID: 20942686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.
    Magheli A; Gonzalgo ML; Su LM; Guzzo TJ; Netto G; Humphreys EB; Han M; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(12):1956-62. PubMed ID: 21044243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective study of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy at the same institution.
    Suzuki Y; Matsuzawa I; Hamasaki T; Kimura G; Kondo Y
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2012; 79(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 23291839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique.
    Su LM; Link RE; Bhayani SB; Sullivan W; Pavlovich CP
    Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 15245948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
    Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
    Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.
    Nyberg M; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Sjoberg D; Wilderäng U; Carlsson SV; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):353-360. PubMed ID: 31158073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgeon heterogeneity significantly affects functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the Swedish LAPPRO trial.
    Nyberg M; Sjoberg DD; Carlsson SV; Wilderäng U; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wiklund P; Steineck G; Haglind E; Hugosson J; Bjartell A
    BJU Int; 2021 Mar; 127(3):361-368. PubMed ID: 32916021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
    Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
    BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience.
    Ghavamian R; Knoll A; Boczko J; Melman A
    Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 16678887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up.
    Lantz A; Bock D; Akre O; Angenete E; Bjartell A; Carlsson S; Modig KK; Nyberg M; Kollberg KS; Steineck G; Stranne J; Wiklund P; Haglind E
    Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):650-660. PubMed ID: 34538508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Bhayani SB; Pavlovich CP; Hsu TS; Sullivan W; Su Li
    Urology; 2003 Mar; 61(3):612-6. PubMed ID: 12639657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.