These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24508072)
21. Fixation and saliency during search of natural scenes: the case of visual agnosia. Foulsham T; Barton JJ; Kingstone A; Dewhurst R; Underwood G Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1994-2003. PubMed ID: 19428433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Attending to music decreases inattentional blindness. Beanland V; Allen RA; Pammer K Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1282-92. PubMed ID: 21555226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Misdirection, attention and awareness: inattentional blindness reveals temporal relationship between eye movements and visual awareness. Kuhn G; Findlay JM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):136-46. PubMed ID: 19459083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Generating customised experimental stimuli for visual search using Genetic Algorithms shows evidence for a continuum of search efficiency. Verma M; McOwan PW Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 19059427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons. Becker SI; Horstmann G Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 21208608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Noticing spiders on the left: Evidence on attentional bias and spider fear in the inattentional blindness paradigm. Brailsford R; Catherwood D; Tyson PJ; Edgar G Laterality; 2014; 19(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 23611253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search. Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modeling eye movements in visual agnosia with a saliency map approach: bottom-up guidance or top-down strategy? Foulsham T; Barton JJ; Kingstone A; Dewhurst R; Underwood G Neural Netw; 2011 Aug; 24(6):665-77. PubMed ID: 21316191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency. Tsvetanov KA; Mevorach C; Allen H; Humphreys GW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1382-94. PubMed ID: 23812959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inattentional blindness for a noxious multimodal stimulus. Wayand JF; Levin DT; Varakin DA Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 16255124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. Einhäuser W; Rutishauser U; Koch C J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):2.1-19. PubMed ID: 18318628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does working memory capacity predict cross-modally induced failures of awareness? Kreitz C; Furley P; Simons DJ; Memmert D Conscious Cogn; 2016 Jan; 39():18-27. PubMed ID: 26658847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention. Newby EA; Rock I Perception; 1998; 27(9):1025-40. PubMed ID: 10341933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces. Hershler O; Hochstein S Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]