124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24508298)
1. Can extraction sites affect the profile?
Barthelemi S
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):49-83. PubMed ID: 24508298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Incisor repositioning: a new approach in orthodontics].
Dallel I; Khemiri M; Fathallah S; Ben Rejeb S; Tobji S; Ben Amor A
Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 26655419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The impact of extractions on profile esthetics: a statistical study].
Malki M; Zaoui F; Bouklouz A
Int Orthod; 2009 Mar; 7(1):31-54. PubMed ID: 20303901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower second molar extraction in correction of severe skeletal class III malocclusion.
Lin J; Gu Y
Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 16539545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Orthodontics. Part 8: Extractions in orthodontics.
Travess H; Roberts-Harry D; Sandy J
Br Dent J; 2004 Feb; 196(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 15039723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of premolar extractions on long-term adult facial aesthetics and apparent age.
Janson G; Junqueira CH; Mendes LM; Garib DG
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26070924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions.
Kocadereli I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jul; 122(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 12142899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.
Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR; Zaher AR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 7817959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Premolar and additional first molar extraction effects on soft tissue. Effects on high Angle Class II division 1 patients.
Ozaki T; Ozaki S; Kuroda K
Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 17319758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions.
Bravo LA; Canut JA; Pascual A; Bravo B
Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9088600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angle Class III malocclusion treated with mandibular first molar extractions.
Ruellas AC; Baratieri C; Roma MB; Izquierdo Ade M; Boaventura L; Rodrigues CS; Telles V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 22920705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of premolar extractions on Bolton overall ratios and tooth-size discrepancies in a Japanese orthodontic population.
Endo T; Ishida K; Shundo I; Sakaeda K; Shimooka S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 20362911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of first premolar extractions on third molar angulations.
Saysel MY; Meral GD; Kocadereli I; Taşar F
Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):719-22. PubMed ID: 16287223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preliminary investigation of lower second molar extraction in correction of severe skeletal class III malocclusion].
Lin JX; Gu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 41(9):537-41. PubMed ID: 17129425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criteria for performing extraction in the treatment of certain malocclusions.
Moshiri F
Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 20236923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Simão TM; Barros SE; Janson M; de Freitas MR
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 21490991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The vertical dimension: the "low-angle" patient.
Vaden JL
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 15952548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
