These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24508611)

  • 41. Across-task long-term priming: interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval.
    Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1414-29. PubMed ID: 20043270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Colavita dominance effect revisited: the effect of semantic congruity.
    Stubblefield A; Jacobs LA; Kim Y; Goolkasian P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1827-39. PubMed ID: 23943499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The target of task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Jun; 64(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 20565179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Unconscious task set priming with phonological and semantic tasks.
    Weibel S; Giersch A; Dehaene S; Huron C
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):517-27. PubMed ID: 23558083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Delta plots with negative-going slopes as a potential marker of decreasing response activation in masked semantic priming.
    Ellinghaus R; Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28251371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Facilitated lexical ambiguity processing by transcranial direct current stimulation over the left inferior frontal cortex.
    Ihara AS; Mimura T; Soshi T; Yorifuji S; Hirata M; Goto T; Yoshinime T; Umehara H; Fujimaki N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 27(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25208744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
    Yap MJ; Lim GY; Pexman PM
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1148-67. PubMed ID: 26155967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Affective processing requires awareness.
    Lähteenmäki M; Hyönä J; Koivisto M; Nummenmaa L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Apr; 144(2):339-65. PubMed ID: 25559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters?
    Fischer R; Miller J
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18521582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Modulation of Gestural-verbal Semantic Integration by tDCS.
    Cohen-Maximov T; Avirame K; Flöel A; Lavidor M
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 25558040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching.
    Mueller SC; Swainson R; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1157():56-65. PubMed ID: 17544384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Primacy of emotional vs. semantic scene recognition in peripheral vision.
    Calvo MG; Avero P; Nummenmaa L
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Dec; 25(8):1358-75. PubMed ID: 21432649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The electrophysiological locus of the redundant target effect on visual discrimination in a dual singleton search task.
    Akyürek EG; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():180-90. PubMed ID: 24060644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interhemispheric transfer of visual information: Meaningfulness and response formation.
    Markus A; Manor D; Konis D; Eviatar Z
    Brain Cogn; 2023 Aug; 170():106003. PubMed ID: 37295143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Access to lexical information in language comprehension: semantics before syntax.
    Müller O; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 16417685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.
    Parmentier FB
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):345-62. PubMed ID: 19007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects: the role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line.
    Castronovo J; Seron X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):101-19. PubMed ID: 17162510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.