These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24509001)

  • 1. Collective variable driven molecular dynamics to improve protein-protein docking scoring.
    Masone D; Grosdidier S
    Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Apr; 49():1-6. PubMed ID: 24509001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. H-bond network optimization in protein-protein complexes: are all-atom force field scores enough?
    Masone D; Vaca IC; Pons C; Recio JF; Guallar V
    Proteins; 2012 Mar; 80(3):818-24. PubMed ID: 22113891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.
    Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Jul; 250(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 7541840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complementarity of hydrophobic properties in ATP-protein binding: a new criterion to rank docking solutions.
    Pyrkov TV; Kosinsky YA; Arseniev AS; Priestle JP; Jacoby E; Efremov RG
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):388-98. PubMed ID: 17094116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.
    Halperin I; Ma B; Wolfson H; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):409-43. PubMed ID: 12001221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient comprehensive scoring of docked protein complexes using probabilistic support vector machines.
    Martin O; Schomburg D
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1367-78. PubMed ID: 17894343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural prediction of protein-RNA interaction by computational docking with propensity-based statistical potentials.
    Pérez-Cano L; Solernou A; Pons C; Fernández-Recio J
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():293-301. PubMed ID: 19908381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PRL-Dock: protein-ligand docking based on hydrogen bond matching and probabilistic relaxation labeling.
    Wu MY; Dai DQ; Yan H
    Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(9):2137-53. PubMed ID: 22544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking.
    Cheng TM; Blundell TL; Fernandez-Recio J
    Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(2):503-15. PubMed ID: 17444519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein-protein structure prediction by scoring molecular dynamics trajectories of putative poses.
    Sarti E; Gladich I; Zamuner S; Correia BE; Laio A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84(9):1312-20. PubMed ID: 27253756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting protein complex geometries with a neural network.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Lorenzen S; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2010 Mar; 78(4):1026-39. PubMed ID: 19938153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking.
    Smith GR; Sternberg MJ; Bates PA
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Apr; 347(5):1077-101. PubMed ID: 15784265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions.
    Schneider S; Zacharias M
    J Mol Recognit; 2012 Jan; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 22213447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible relaxation of rigid-body docking solutions.
    Król M; Tournier AL; Bates PA
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17397060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility.
    Antes I
    Proteins; 2010 Apr; 78(5):1084-104. PubMed ID: 20017216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural characterization of protein-protein complexes by integrating computational docking with small-angle scattering data.
    Pons C; D'Abramo M; Svergun DI; Orozco M; Bernadó P; Fernández-Recio J
    J Mol Biol; 2010 Oct; 403(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 20804770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining statistical potentials with dynamics-based entropies improves selection from protein decoys and docking poses.
    Zimmermann MT; Leelananda SP; Kloczkowski A; Jernigan RL
    J Phys Chem B; 2012 Jun; 116(23):6725-31. PubMed ID: 22490366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding.
    Grünberg R; Leckner J; Nilges M
    Structure; 2004 Dec; 12(12):2125-36. PubMed ID: 15576027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.