These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24509046)

  • 21. Validation of the OptiSafe™ eye irritation test.
    Choksi N; Lebrun S; Nguyen M; Daniel A; DeGeorge G; Willoughby J; Layton A; Lowther D; Merrill J; Matheson J; Barroso J; Yozzo K; Casey W; Allen D
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2020 Sep; 39(3):180-192. PubMed ID: 32586141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive performance and inter-laboratory reproducibility in assessing eye irritation potential of water- and oil-soluble mixtures using the Short Time Exposure test method.
    Abo T; Hilberer A; Behle-Wagner C; Watanabe M; Cameron D; Kirst A; Nukada Y; Yuki T; Araki D; Sakaguchi H; Itagaki H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Apr; 48():78-85. PubMed ID: 29305980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inter-laboratory study of short time exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) classification.
    Takahashi Y; Hayashi T; Watanabe S; Hayashi K; Koike M; Aisawa N; Ebata S; Sakaguchi H; Nakamura T; Kuwahara H; Nishiyama N
    J Toxicol Sci; 2009 Dec; 34(6):611-26. PubMed ID: 19952497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches.
    Scott L; Eskes C; Hoffmann S; Adriaens E; Alepée N; Bufo M; Clothier R; Facchini D; Faller C; Guest R; Harbell J; Hartung T; Kamp H; Varlet BL; Meloni M; McNamee P; Osborne R; Pape W; Pfannenbecker U; Prinsen M; Seaman C; Spielmann H; Stokes W; Trouba K; Berghe CV; Goethem FV; Vassallo M; Vinardell P; Zuang V
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Feb; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19490935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A rapid cell culture technique for assessing the toxicity of detergent-based products in vitro as a possible screen for eye irritancy in vivo.
    Kemp RB; Meredith RW; Gamble S; Frost M
    Cytobios; 1983; 36(143-44):153-9. PubMed ID: 6851660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).
    Barroso J; Pfannenbecker U; Adriaens E; Alépée N; Cluzel M; De Smedt A; Hibatallah J; Klaric M; Mewes KR; Millet M; Templier M; McNamee P
    Arch Toxicol; 2017 Feb; 91(2):521-547. PubMed ID: 26997338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ocular irritation reversibility assessment of a laundry detergent using the Porcine Corneal Opacity Reversibility Assay (PorCORA): a focused study.
    Vij P; Brinkman A; Koch RM; DeGeorge G; Wolter M
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2024 Mar; 43(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 38099874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictive performance of the Short Time Exposure test for identifying eye irritation potential of chemical mixtures.
    Saito K; Miyazawa M; Nukada Y; Ei K; Abo T; Sakaguchi H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Apr; 29(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 25681760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The usefulness of the validated SkinEthic™ RHE test method to identify skin corrosive UN GHS subcategories.
    Alépée N; Robert C; Tornier C; Cotovio J
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Jun; 28(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 24389111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.
    Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J;
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Isolated Chicken Eye test to replace the Draize test in rabbits.
    Prinsen MK; Hendriksen CFM; Krul CAM; Woutersen RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():132-149. PubMed ID: 28192172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS).
    Scheel J; Kleber M; Kreutz J; Lehringer E; Mehling A; Reisinger K; Steiling W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 21310206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33.
    Kang Y; Jeong B; Lim DH; Lee D; Lim KM
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Dec; 84(23):960-972. PubMed ID: 34328061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Retrospective evaluation of the eye irritation potential of agrochemical formulations.
    Choksi N; Latorre A; Catalano S; Grivel A; Baldassari J; Pires J; Corvaro M; Silva M; Ogasawara M; Inforzato M; Habe P; Murata R; Stinchcombe S; Kolle SN; Masinja W; Perjessy G; Daniel A; Allen D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2024 Jan; 146():105543. PubMed ID: 38081574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of eye irritation potential of liquid and granular laundry detergent formulas using the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay.
    Cater KC; Harbell JW
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 32(3):210-21. PubMed ID: 23360218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part II: Eye.
    Charmeau-Genevois C; Sarang S; Perea M; Mayer N; Eadsforth C; Austin T; Thomas P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104935. PubMed ID: 33901590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expansion of the applicability domain for highly volatile substances on the Short Time Exposure test method and the predictive performance in assessing eye irritation potential.
    Abo T; Yuki T; Xu R; Araki D; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Itagaki H
    J Toxicol Sci; 2018; 43(7):407-422. PubMed ID: 29973473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A retrospective analysis of in vivo eye irritation, skin irritation and skin sensitisation studies with agrochemical formulations: Setting the scene for development of alternative strategies.
    Corvaro M; Gehen S; Andrews K; Chatfield R; Macleod F; Mehta J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 89():131-147. PubMed ID: 28668334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Porcine Corneal Ocular Reversibility Assay (PorCORA) predicts ocular damage and recovery for global regulatory agency hazard categories.
    Piehl M; Carathers M; Soda R; Cerven D; DeGeorge G
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Dec; 25(8):1912-8. PubMed ID: 21708243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
    Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.