These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24509895)

  • 1. Databases and registers: useful tools for research, no studies.
    Curbelo RJ; Loza E; de Yébenes MJ; Carmona L
    Rheumatol Int; 2014 Apr; 34(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 24509895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nationwide Inpatient Sample and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program give different results in hip fracture studies.
    Bohl DD; Basques BA; Golinvaux NS; Baumgaertner MR; Grauer JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1672-80. PubMed ID: 24615426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of Outcomes After TKA: Do All Databases Produce Similar Findings?
    Bedard NA; Pugely AJ; McHugh M; Lux N; Otero JE; Bozic KJ; Gao Y; Callaghan JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 29529616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of Registries and Large Databases for Toxicology Research.
    Mazer-Amirshahi M; Laub DA; Mycyk MB
    J Med Toxicol; 2024 Sep; 20(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 38366308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Harmonization of Databases: A Step for Advancing the Knowledge About Spinal Cord Injury.
    Charlifue S; Tate D; Biering-Sorensen F; Burns S; Chen Y; Chun S; Jakeman LB; Kowalski RG; Noonan VK; Ullrich P
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Oct; 97(10):1805-18. PubMed ID: 27137095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview and Limitations of Database Research in Anesthesiology: A Narrative Review.
    Abdel-Kader AK; Eisenkraft JB; Katz DJ
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Apr; 132(4):1012-1022. PubMed ID: 33346984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of administrative medical databases in population-based research.
    Gavrielov-Yusim N; Friger M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2014 Mar; 68(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 24248997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment.
    Raftery J; Roderick P; Stevens A
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 May; 9(20):1-92, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15899148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Administrative registers in psychiatric research: a systematic review of validity studies.
    Byrne N; Regan C; Howard L
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2005 Dec; 112(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 16279869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Administrative Databases in Sports Medicine Research.
    Wasserstein D; Sheth U
    Clin Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 37(3):483-494. PubMed ID: 29903387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Big data in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery: from large databases to registries.
    Smith AM; Chaiet SR
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 25(4):273-279. PubMed ID: 28525400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional requirements regarding medical registries--preliminary results.
    Oberbichler S; Hörbst A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():112-4. PubMed ID: 23823393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comment On: Use of Patient Registries and Administrative Datasets for the Study of Pediatric Cancer.
    Gupta S
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2016 Feb; 63(2):367. PubMed ID: 26505636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reply to Comment on "Use of Patient Registries and Administrative Datasets for the Study of Pediatric Cancer".
    Rice HE
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2016 Feb; 63(2):368. PubMed ID: 26505755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-centre, multi-database studies with common protocols: lessons learnt from the IMI PROTECT project.
    Klungel OH; Kurz X; de Groot MC; Schlienger RG; Tcherny-Lessenot S; Grimaldi L; Ibáñez L; Groenwold RH; Reynolds RF
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Mar; 25 Suppl 1():156-65. PubMed ID: 27038361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary and secondary patient data in contrast: the use of observational studies like RABBIT.
    Richter A; Meißner Y; Strangfeld A; Zink A
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2016; 34(5 Suppl 101):S79-S86. PubMed ID: 27762200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary immunodeficiency registries.
    Knerr V; Grimbacher B
    Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Dec; 7(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 17989523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. United States Administrative Databases and Cancer Registries for Thoracic Surgery Health Services Research.
    Groth SS; Habermann EB; Massarweh NN
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Mar; 109(3):636-644. PubMed ID: 31580852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Health registries: methodological issues].
    Bruzzi P
    Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Sep; 106(9):436-43. PubMed ID: 26418505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada's administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry.
    Metcalfe A; Sibbald B; Lowry RB; Tough S; Bernier FP
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2014 Feb; 100(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 24307632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.