These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24510424)

  • 1. The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: naturally familiar brand logos are found faster.
    Qin XA; Koutstaal W; Engel SA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):914-30. PubMed ID: 24510424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli.
    Mruczek RE; Sheinberg DL
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Aug; 67(6):1016-31. PubMed ID: 16396010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory color effect induced by familiarity of brand logos.
    Kimura A; Wada Y; Masuda T; Goto S; Tsuzuki D; Hibino H; Cai D; Dan I
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68474. PubMed ID: 23874638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.
    Guo Z; Niu M; Wang Q
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7560. PubMed ID: 33828108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of familiarization strategies on the missing-letter effect.
    Plamondon A; Roy-Charland A; Chamberland J; Quenneville J; Laforge C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1675-1683. PubMed ID: 27277381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception.
    Rossion B; Schiltz C; Robaye L; Pirenne D; Crommelinck M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):1019-34. PubMed ID: 11595103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The speed of recognition of personally familiar faces.
    Ramon M; Caharel S; Rossion B
    Perception; 2011; 40(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 21805919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Apple of the mind's eye: Everyday attention, metamemory, and reconstructive memory for the Apple logo.
    Blake AB; Nazarian M; Castel AD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 25721103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid response learning of brand logo priming: Evidence that brand priming is not dominated by rapid response learning.
    Boehm SG; Smith C; Muench N; Noble K; Atherton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1807-1816. PubMed ID: 28856966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do preschool children learn to read words from environmental prints?
    Zhao J; Zhao P; Weng X; Li S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85745. PubMed ID: 24465677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP evidence for rapid hedonic evaluation of logos.
    Handy TC; Smilek D; Geiger L; Liu C; Schooler JW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 22(1):124-38. PubMed ID: 19199410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Language experience shapes early electrophysiological responses to visual stimuli: the effects of writing system, stimulus length, and presentation duration.
    Xue G; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2025-37. PubMed ID: 18053744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex composition modulates the effects of familiarity in new environment.
    Lucon-Xiccato T; Mazzoldi C; Griggio M
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():133-138. PubMed ID: 28478322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The preview benefit for familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Persike M; Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2013 Jul; 87():1-9. PubMed ID: 23694681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familiarity speeds up visual short-term memory consolidation.
    Xie W; Zhang W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1207-1221. PubMed ID: 28287761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.