These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2451070)

  • 1. [Identification of the parameters of single-compartment models of the intravenous glucose tolerance test (review of the literature)].
    Dreval' AV
    Lab Delo; 1988; (1):3-9. PubMed ID: 2451070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Identification of the parameters of 2-compartment models of the intravenous glucose tolerance test].
    Dreval' AV
    Lab Delo; 1988; (9):18-22. PubMed ID: 2461466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Value of oral and intravenous glucose tolerance test].
    Herrmann G; Bottermann P; Pelzl K
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1973; 7():341-7. PubMed ID: 4533046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of the intravenous glucose tolerance test using a simple mathematical model].
    Dreval' AV
    Lab Delo; 1985; (5):276-80. PubMed ID: 2409332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian two-compartment and classic single-compartment minimal models: comparison on insulin modified IVGTT and effect of experiment reduction.
    Callegari T; Caumo A; Cobelli C
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Dec; 50(12):1301-9. PubMed ID: 14656059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of the results of a peroral glucose tolerance test using a mathematical model].
    Dreval' AV
    Lab Delo; 1985; (12):737-41. PubMed ID: 2418273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hot IVGTT two-compartment minimal model: an improved version.
    Toffolo G; Cobelli C
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2003 Feb; 284(2):E317-21. PubMed ID: 12388140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiologic modeling of the intravenous glucose tolerance test in type 2 diabetes: a new approach to the insulin compartment.
    Ward GM; Walters JM; Barton J; Alford FP; Boston RC
    Metabolism; 2001 May; 50(5):512-9. PubMed ID: 11319711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mathematical model of the oral glucose tolerance test illustrating the effects of the incretins.
    Brubaker PL; Ohayon EL; D'Alessandro LM; Norwich KH
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1286-300. PubMed ID: 17393338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new model to fit glucose concentration during the insulin tolerance test improving the predictive capability to estimate insulin sensitivity.
    González-Ortiz LJ; Martínez-Abundis E; González-Ortiz M
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2006 Jan; 16(1):78-9. PubMed ID: 16399495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified minimal model using a single-step fitting process for the intravenous glucose tolerance test in Type 2 diabetes and healthy humans.
    Zheng Y; Zhao M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Jul; 79(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 15885849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of insulin sensitivity by the minimal model method using a simplified intravenous glucose tolerance test: validity and reproducibility.
    Duysinx BC; Scheen AJ; Gerard PL; Letiexhe MR; Paquot N; Lefebvre PJ
    Diabete Metab; 1994; 20(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 7843475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility and comparability of insulin sensitivity indices measured by stable-label intravenous glucose tolerance test.
    Hovorka R; Bannister P; Eckland DJ; Halliday D; Murley DN; Rees SE; Young MA
    Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 9545125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A device for the rapid determination of intravenous glucose tolerance test results (author's transl)].
    Schmid P
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Aug; 86(15):428-30. PubMed ID: 4408422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First phase release coefficient of insulin in subjects with normal glucose tolerance on glucose infusion analyzed by computer simulation.
    Huang CN; Chou WC; Lin LY; Peng CC; Chyau CC; Chen KC; Peng RY
    Biosystems; 2008 Jan; 91(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17905511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness determined by the one- and two-compartment-labeled minimal model in late prepubertal children and early adolescents.
    Hoffman RP; Vicini P; Cobelli C
    Metabolism; 2002 Dec; 51(12):1582-6. PubMed ID: 12489072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness during a standardized breakfast test: comparison with the minimal model analysis of an intravenous glucose tolerance test.
    Aloulou I; Brun JF; Mercier J
    Metabolism; 2006 May; 55(5):676-90. PubMed ID: 16631446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative study of oral and intravenous glucose tolerance test during pregnancy (author's transl)].
    Pinget M; Dorner M; Gandar R; Brettes P; Krummel Y; Tourne CE
    Sem Hop; 1980 Mar 8-15; 56(9-10):418-23. PubMed ID: 6244659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A model of the oral glucose tolerance test].
    Tamarit Torres J
    An R Acad Nac Med (Madr); 1985; 102(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 3896011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intravenous glucose loading with simplified calculation of glucose assimilation coefficient].
    Takác A; Mertens R
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1966 Mar; 60(6):371-3. PubMed ID: 5992482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.