310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24511212)
1. Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24511212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of hemifield sector analysis in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects.
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():843-58. PubMed ID: 23690675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chu DH; Xu L; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma.
Hood DC; Greenstein VC
Prog Retin Eye Res; 2003 Mar; 22(2):201-51. PubMed ID: 12604058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dichoptic stimulation improves detection of glaucoma with multifocal visual evoked potentials.
Arvind H; Klistorner A; Graham S; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Klistorner A; Billson FA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4590-6. PubMed ID: 17898282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects.
Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Chen CS; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12834667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical use of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in a glaucoma practice: a prospective study.
De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Hood DC
Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 125(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22476612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma.
Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the visual function in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal-tension glaucoma by means of the multifocal visual evoked potentials.
Gutiérrez-Díaz E; Pérez-Rico C; de Atauri MJ; Mencía-Gutiérrez E; Blanco R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 250(11):1681-8. PubMed ID: 22411129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multifocal visual evoked potential and automated perimetry abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes.
Greenstein VC; Eggers HM; Hood DC
J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17651996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting conversion to glaucoma using standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology.
Takahashi G; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 255(4):797-803. PubMed ID: 28110356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying preperimetric functional loss in glaucoma: a blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials study.
Arvind H; Graham S; Leaney J; Grigg J; Goldberg I; Billson F; Klistorner A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1134-41. PubMed ID: 19395037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect Patients.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmology; 2021 Oct; 128(10):1405-1416. PubMed ID: 33722636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and multifocal visual evoked potential in glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and control patients.
Kanadani FN; Mello PA; Dorairaj SK; Kanadani TC
Clin Ophthalmol; 2014; 8():1323-30. PubMed ID: 25075173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
