These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24512061)

  • 1. Living in the moment: effects of time perspective and emotional valence of episodic thinking on delay discounting.
    Lin H; Epstein LH
    Behav Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 128(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24512061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heroin delay discounting and impulsivity: Modulation by DRD1 genetic variation.
    Moses TEH; Burmeister M; Greenwald MK
    Addict Biol; 2020 May; 25(3):e12777. PubMed ID: 31192519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis of the effects of episodic future thinking on delay discounting.
    Ye JY; Ding QY; Cui JF; Liu Z; Jia LX; Qin XJ; Xu H; Wang Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Oct; 75(10):1876-1891. PubMed ID: 34841982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commonly-occurring polymorphisms in the COMT, DRD1 and DRD2 genes influence different aspects of motor sequence learning in humans.
    Baetu I; Burns NR; Urry K; Barbante GG; Pitcher JB
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Nov; 125():176-88. PubMed ID: 26419600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future is now: comparing the effect of episodic future thinking on impulsivity in lean and obese individuals.
    Daniel TO; Stanton CM; Epstein LH
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():120-5. PubMed ID: 23917063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epistatic effect of Ankyrin repeat and kinase domain containing 1 - Dopamine receptor D2 and catechol-o-methyltransferase single nucleotide polymorphisms on the risk for hazardous use of alcohol in Lithuanian population.
    Kaminskaite M; Jokubka R; Janaviciute J; Lelyte I; Sinkariova L; Pranckeviciene A; Borutaite V; Bunevicius A
    Gene; 2021 Jan; 765():145107. PubMed ID: 32889058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focus on the future: Episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking.
    Dassen FCM; Jansen A; Nederkoorn C; Houben K
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():327-332. PubMed ID: 26431684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concreteness and emotional valence of episodic future thinking (EFT) independently affect the dynamics of intertemporal decisions.
    Calluso C; Tosoni A; Cannito L; Committeri G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217224. PubMed ID: 31136620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does goal relevant episodic future thinking amplify the effect on delay discounting?
    O'Donnell S; Oluyomi Daniel T; Epstein LH
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 May; 51():10-16. PubMed ID: 28282631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in reward valuation and future thinking during intertemporal choice.
    Ciaramelli E; De Luca F; Kwan D; Mok J; Bianconi F; Knyagnytska V; Craver C; Green L; Myerson J; Rosenbaum RS
    Elife; 2021 Aug; 10():. PubMed ID: 34342577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of delay discounting in intertemporal decisions by future thinking: Accounting for fluency, contents, and functions of future thoughts.
    Eivazi F; Hatami J; Moradi A; Nazem-Zadeh MR
    Brain Behav; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e2764. PubMed ID: 36120724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective.
    O'Donnell S; Hollis-Hansen K; Epstein LH
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2018 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30577671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imagining emotional events benefits future-oriented decisions.
    Ballance BC; Tuen YJ; Petrucci AS; Orwig W; Safi OK; Madan CR; Palombo DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2332-2348. PubMed ID: 35225089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in adults.
    Carr KA; Hollis-Hansen K; Austin K; Epstein LH
    Learn Motiv; 2021 May; 74():. PubMed ID: 36425115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvements in episodic future thinking methodology: Establishing a standardized episodic thinking control.
    Hollis-Hansen K; O'Donnell SE; Seidman JS; Brande SJ; Epstein LH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214397. PubMed ID: 30921384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working Memory Training Improves Alcohol Users' Episodic Future Thinking: A Rate-Dependent Analysis.
    Snider SE; Deshpande HU; Lisinski JM; Koffarnus MN; LaConte SM; Bickel WK
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2018 Feb; 3(2):160-167. PubMed ID: 29529411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and energy intake in children.
    Daniel TO; Said M; Stanton CM; Epstein LH
    Eat Behav; 2015 Aug; 18():20-4. PubMed ID: 25863227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do process simulations during episodic future thinking enhance the reduction of delay discounting for middle income participants and those living in poverty?
    O'Donnell S; Daniel TO; Koroschetz J; Kilanowski C; Otminski A; Bickel WK; Epstein LH
    J Behav Decis Mak; 2019 Jul; 32(3):231-240. PubMed ID: 34334945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demand characteristics in episodic future thinking II: The role of cues and cue content in changing delay discounting.
    Rung JM; Madden GJ
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2019 Oct; 27(5):482-495. PubMed ID: 30762382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of acute dopamine precusor depletion on immediate reward selection bias and working memory depend on catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype.
    Kelm MK; Boettiger CA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 25(12):2061-71. PubMed ID: 23937688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.