These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24512440)

  • 41. Biomechanical evaluation of 5 fixation devices for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis.
    Capo JT; Melamed E; Shamian B; Hadley SR; Ng Lai W; Gerszberg K; Rivero S; Caravaggi P
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):1971-7. PubMed ID: 25257487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of plate type and placement on the immobilization of bilateral equine mandibular osteotomies: Ex vivo study.
    Durket E; Kersh K; Dembek K; Riedesel E; Silverstone A; Kraus KH
    Vet Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(8):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 30951203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Biomechanical Properties of the 1.5 mm Locking Compression Plate: Comparison with the 1.5 and 2.0 mm Straight Plates in Compression and Torsion.
    Watrous GK; Moens NMM; Runciman J; Gibson TWG
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Nov; 31(6):438-444. PubMed ID: 30357797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A locking compression plate versus the gold-standard non-locking plate with lag screw for first metatarsophalangeal fusion: A biomechanical comparison.
    Mandell D; Karbassi J; Zhou H; Burroughs B; Aurigemma P; Patel AR
    Foot (Edinb); 2018 Mar; 34():69-73. PubMed ID: 29353123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
    Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biomechanical comparison of a locking compression plate combined with an intramedullary pin or a polyetheretherketone rod in a cadaveric canine tibia gap model.
    Beierer LH; Glyde M; Day RE; Hosgood GL
    Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 25132257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical use of the locking compression plate (LCP) in horses: a retrospective study of 31 cases (2004-2006).
    Levine DG; Richardson DW
    Equine Vet J; 2007 Sep; 39(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 17910263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
    Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
    Sod GA; Mitchell CF; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
    Vet Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 18394076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro mechanical evaluation of a limited contact dynamic compression plate and hybrid carpal arthrodesis plate for canine pancarpal arthrodesis.
    Guillou RP; Demianiuk RM; Sinnott MT; Curcio K; DeCamp CE; Haut RC; Déjardin LM
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2012; 25(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 22027813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In vitro comparison between a DCP and external fixator for pancarpal arthrodesis in the dog.
    Viguier E; Znaty D; Medelci M; Degueurce C
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2001 Apr; (33):32-5. PubMed ID: 11721564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joints of a hindlimb in a heifer.
    Muggli E; Weidmann E; Bruderer A; Nuss K
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 25394407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Biomechanical and computational evaluation of two loading transfer concepts for pancarpal arthrodesis in dogs.
    Rothstock S; Kowaleski MP; Boudrieau RJ; Beale BS; Piras A; Ryan M; Bouré L; Brianza S
    Am J Vet Res; 2012 Nov; 73(11):1687-95. PubMed ID: 23106452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Screw fixation compared to H-locking plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a biomechanical study.
    Cohen DA; Parks BG; Schon LC
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Nov; 26(11):984-9. PubMed ID: 16309614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A biomechanical comparison of conventional dynamic compression plates and string-of-pearls™ locking plates using cantilever bending in a canine Ilial fracture model.
    Kenzig AR; Butler JR; Priddy LB; Lacy KR; Elder SH
    BMC Vet Res; 2017 Jul; 13(1):222. PubMed ID: 28705189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis in 22 horses.
    Schaer TP; Bramlage LR; Embertson RM; Hance S
    Equine Vet J; 2001 Jul; 33(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 11469768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A biomechanical evaluation of a Hybrid Dynamic Compression Plate and a CastLess Arthrodesis Plate for pancarpal arthrodesis in dogs.
    Meeson RL; Goodship AE; Arthurs GI
    Vet Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(6):738-44. PubMed ID: 22642497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs.
    Blake CA; Boudrieau RJ; Torrance BS; Tacvorian EK; Cabassu JB; Gaudette GR; Kowaleski MP
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2011; 24(6):408-17. PubMed ID: 21938314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model.
    Pearson T; Glyde M; Hosgood G; Day R
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 25633043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of a collateral ligament sparing surgical approach on mechanical properties of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis constructs.
    Bras JJ; Lillich JD; Beard WL; Anderson DE; Armbrust LJ; Frink E; Lease K
    Vet Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 21077916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.