These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24512467)

  • 1. Sequential effects in continued visual search: using fixation-related potentials to compare distractor processing before and after target detection.
    Körner C; Braunstein V; Stangl M; Schlögl A; Neuper C; Ischebeck A
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Apr; 51(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 24512467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target probability modulates fixation-related potentials in visual search.
    Hiebel H; Ischebeck A; Brunner C; Nikolaev AR; Höfler M; Körner C
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():199-210. PubMed ID: 30253233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refixation patterns reveal memory-encoding strategies in free viewing.
    Meghanathan RN; Nikolaev AR; van Leeuwen C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2499-2516. PubMed ID: 31044400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):614-21. PubMed ID: 16236336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target-distractor similarity has a larger impact on visual search in school-age children than spacing.
    Huurneman B; Boonstra FN
    J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.23. PubMed ID: 25613761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Target processing in overt serial visual search involves the dorsal attention network: A fixation-based event-related fMRI study.
    Ischebeck A; Hiebel H; Miller J; Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Mar; 153():107763. PubMed ID: 33493526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.
    Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Sutton DJ; Beesley T; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 29147961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Looking for a face in the crowd: fixation-related potentials in an eye-movement visual search task.
    Kaunitz LN; Kamienkowski JE; Varatharajah A; Sigman M; Quiroga RQ; Ison MJ
    Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 89():297-305. PubMed ID: 24342226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The emergence of frequency effects in eye movements.
    Vanyukov PM; Warren T; Wheeler ME; Reichle ED
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 22264379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements in iconic visual search.
    Rao RP; Zelinsky GJ; Hayhoe MM; Ballard DH
    Vision Res; 2002 May; 42(11):1447-63. PubMed ID: 12044751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overt and covert visual search in primates: reaction times and gaze shift strategies.
    Nothdurft HC; Pigarev IN; Kastner S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 8(2):137-74. PubMed ID: 19618485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual search deficits in Williams-Beuren syndrome.
    Montfoort I; Frens MA; Hooge IT; Haselen GC; van der Geest JN
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):931-8. PubMed ID: 17010393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of task-related refixation behavior.
    Meghanathan RN; van Leeuwen C; Giannini M; Nikolaev AR
    Vision Res; 2020 Oct; 175():90-101. PubMed ID: 32795708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search.
    Najemnik J; Geisler WS
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7031):387-91. PubMed ID: 15772663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.
    Körner C; Gilchrist ID
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):846-51. PubMed ID: 18087948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for interactions between target selection and visual fixation for saccade generation in humans.
    Munoz DP; Corneil BD
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 103(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 7615032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distinguishing between target and nontarget fixations in a visual search task using fixation-related potentials.
    Brouwer AM; Reuderink B; Vincent J; van Gerven MA; van Erp JB
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(3):17. PubMed ID: 23863335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.